Van Niekerk v Van Niekerk and Others (26021/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 120 (18 March 2016)
The court found that the contested will dated 10 August 2013 was drafted and signed by the deceased with the clear intention to revoke his previous will and bequeath his entire estate to his three children. The evidence of the handwriting expert confirmed the authenticity of the signature, and the affidavit of Bezuidenhout corroborated that the deceased showed her the signed will before his death. The psychiatric reports indicated the deceased was emotionally stable and capable of forming testamentary intention at the relevant time. Allegations of fraud and forgery were not substantiated and were found to be irrelevant to the determination of the deceased's intention regarding the will....
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 120
- Parties
- Applicant: Van Niekerk, W; Respondent: Van Niekerk, S N.O.; Respondent: Van Niekerk, S; Respondent: Van Niekerk, S M; Respondent: Van Niekerk, W S; Respondent: Van Niekerk, R G; Respondent: Master of the High Court, Nelspruit; Respondent: Wynand Prinsloo & Van Eeden Ingelyf
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2016
- Case Number
- 26021/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Acceptance of Will Under Section 2(3) of the Wills Act
- Outcome
- Application granted. The contested will is accepted as the last will of the deceased. The previous will is revoked. An independent executor is to be appointed. Costs awarded against first and second respondents.
- Judges
- AC Basson
- Legal Topics
- Wills Act Section 2 3, Revocation of Previous Will, Testamentary Intention, Appointment of Executor, Allegations of Fraud, Minor Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Van Niekerk, W
Applicant
Van Niekerk, S N.O.
Respondent
Van Niekerk, S
Respondent
Van Niekerk, S M
Respondent
Van Niekerk, W S
Respondent
Van Niekerk, R G
Respondent
Master of the High Court, Nelspruit
Respondent
Wynand Prinsloo & Van Eeden Ingelyf
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Acceptance of Will Under Section 2(3) of the Wills Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contested will dated 10 August 2013 was intended by the deceased to be his last will and testament.
- 2 Whether the contested will should be accepted by the Master of the High Court under section 2(3) of the Wills Act despite non-compliance with formalities.
- 3 Whether the previous will dated 11 February 2008 was revoked by the contested will.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the contested will dated 10 August 2013 was drafted and signed by the deceased with the clear intention to revoke his previous will and bequeath his entire estate to his three children. The evidence of the handwriting expert confirmed the authenticity of the signature, and the affidavit of Bezuidenhout corroborated that the deceased showed her the signed will before his death. The psychiatric reports indicated the deceased was emotionally stable and capable of forming testamentary intention at the relevant time. Allegations of fraud and forgery were not substantiated and were found to be irrelevant to the determination of the deceased's intention regarding the will....
Court Disposition
Application granted. The contested will is accepted as the last will of the deceased. The previous will is revoked. An independent executor is to be appointed. Costs awarded against first and second respondents.
Orders
- The Master of the High Court is directed to accept the document annexed as 'Annexure A' as the will of the late Gert Willem van Niekerk for the purposes of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965.
- The Master is directed to withdraw the Letter of Executorship dated 7 October 2013 appointing the first respondent as executrix under the 2008 will.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment