Van Rensburg v Obiang (21748/2014) [2021] ZAWCHC 128 (18 June 2021)

Van Rensburg v Obiang (21748/2014) [2021] ZAWCHC 128 (18 June 2021)

The court found that the plaintiff was unlawfully arrested, detained, and tortured in Equatorial Guinea at the instance of the defendant, who abused his official position for private interests. The deprivation of liberty was malicious, without lawful cause, and effected through the defendant's control of the Rapid Intervention Force. The plaintiff's evidence, including expert psychological and actuarial reports, was uncontested and established severe physical and psychological harm, as well as permanent impairment of earning capacity. The court accepted the actuarial calculations and corroborating affidavits as sufficient proof of past and future loss of earnings, despite limitations in...

Citation
[2021] ZAWCHC 128
Parties
Plaintiff: Daniel Welman Janse Van Rensburg; Defendant: Teodorin Nguema Obiang
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
18 June 2021
Case Number
21748/2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment on Merits and Quantum
Outcome
Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for general damages, past and future loss of earnings, interest, and costs.
Judges
Lekhuleni
Legal Topics
Unlawful Arrest and Detention, Torture and Cruel Treatment, Quantification of Damages, Attachment Ad Fundandam Jurisdictionem, Loss of Earnings, International Human Rights
Delict Civil Procedure Public International Law Unlawful Arrest and Detention Torture and Cruel Treatment Quantification of Damages Attachment Ad Fundandam Jurisdictionem Loss of Earnings +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Welman Janse Van Rensburg

Plaintiff

Teodorin Nguema Obiang

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment on Merits and Quantum

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable for the unlawful arrest, detention, and torture of the plaintiff in Equatorial Guinea.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for pain and suffering, and patrimonial damages for past and future loss of earnings.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate quantum of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was unlawfully arrested, detained, and tortured in Equatorial Guinea at the instance of the defendant, who abused his official position for private interests. The deprivation of liberty was malicious, without lawful cause, and effected through the defendant's control of the Rapid Intervention Force. The plaintiff's evidence, including expert psychological and actuarial reports, was uncontested and established severe physical and psychological harm, as well as permanent impairment of earning capacity. The court accepted the actuarial calculations and corroborating affidavits as sufficient proof of past and future loss of earnings, despite limitations in...

Court Disposition

Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for general damages, past and future loss of earnings, interest, and costs.

Orders

  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff R9,882,000 in respect of general damages for pain and suffering.
  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff R10,000,000 in respect of past loss of earnings.