van Rooi and Another v Izinyoni Trading 271 (Pty) Ltd and Another (LCC 2022/73) [2023] ZALCC 26 (17 August 2023)
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully evicted from their homestead on land owned by the Hans Coetzee Trust, without a valid court order as required by ESTA and the Constitution. The second respondent, acting on behalf of the Trust, orchestrated the eviction and demolition of the homestead, relying on false representations of a court order to the police, who assisted in the eviction and detention of the applicants. Despite citation errors regarding the land and respondents, the substantive facts established that the applicants were entitled to restoration and reinstatement of occupation. The court held the second respondent personally liable and ordered him to ensure...
- Citation
- [2023] ZALCC 26
- Parties
- Applicant: Naleng Emma van Rooi; Applicant: van Rooi Family; Respondent: Izinyoni Trading 271 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Hendrik Willem Coetzee
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2023
- Case Number
- LCC 2022/73
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Urgent Application for Restoration Following Alleged Unlawful Eviction
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; applicants entitled to immediate restoration and reinstatement of occupation. Second respondent held personally liable for unlawful eviction and ordered to ensure Trust compliance. Further relief available on supplemented papers. Costs awarded against second respondent on attorney and...
- Judges
- Spilg
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Unlawful Eviction, Rei Vindicatio, Constitutional Right to Housing, Joinder and Citation, Restoration of Possession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naleng Emma van Rooi
Applicant
van Rooi Family
Applicant
Izinyoni Trading 271 (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Hendrik Willem Coetzee
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Urgent Application for Restoration Following Alleged Unlawful Eviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants were unlawfully evicted from their homestead without a valid court order.
- 2 Whether the failure to cite the correct landowner (the Trust) and describe the correct land is fatal to the relief sought.
- 3 Whether the second respondent is personally liable for the unlawful eviction and demolition of the homestead.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully evicted from their homestead on land owned by the Hans Coetzee Trust, without a valid court order as required by ESTA and the Constitution. The second respondent, acting on behalf of the Trust, orchestrated the eviction and demolition of the homestead, relying on false representations of a court order to the police, who assisted in the eviction and detention of the applicants. Despite citation errors regarding the land and respondents, the substantive facts established that the applicants were entitled to restoration and reinstatement of occupation. The court held the second respondent personally liable and ordered him to ensure...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; applicants entitled to immediate restoration and reinstatement of occupation. Second respondent held personally liable for unlawful eviction and ordered to ensure Trust compliance. Further relief available on supplemented papers. Costs awarded against second respondent on attorney and...
Orders
- The applicants are entitled to immediate restoration and reinstatement of the use and occupation of the area of land occupied by them immediately prior to 10 January 2022 (the homestead).
- The homestead is situated on land owned by the Hans Coetzee Trust on portions of one or more farms identified as portion RE 959 of the farm Riversdal 171 and portion 1 of the farm Middelveld 170, Limpopo Province.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment