Van Staden v Venter (366/1990) [1991] ZASCA 184; 1992 (1) SA 552 (AD); [1992] 1 All SA 371 (A) (28 November 1991)

Van Staden v Venter (366/1990) [1991] ZASCA 184; 1992 (1) SA 552 (AD); [1992] 1 All SA 371 (A) (28 November 1991)

The majority held that the appellant's claim for R5000 as goodwill value was a right arising from the partnership relationship, as it was integral to the partnership agreement and its existence depended on the partnership. The court found that the wording of the Prescription Act 18 of 1943, specifically the definition of 'person under disability' in relation to partners, was ambiguous regarding the effect of changes in partnership composition. The majority adopted a purposive interpretation, concluding that prescription should be suspended for as long as the litigating partners remained in partnership with each other, regardless of the entry or exit of other partners. This interpretation...

Citation
[1991] ZASCA 184
Parties
Appellant: Pieter Coenraad van Staden; Respondent: Johannes Lodewicus Venter
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 November 1991
Case Number
366/1990
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld; special plea of prescription dismissed; respondent granted leave to plead on the merits.
Judges
Botha, Nestadt, F H Grosskopf, Van Coller, Harms
Legal Topics
Prescription, Partnership Law, Special Plea, Interpretation of Statutes
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Prescription Partnership Law Special Plea Interpretation of Statutes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pieter Coenraad van Staden

Appellant

Johannes Lodewicus Venter

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's claim for payment of R5000 as 'goodwill value' from the respondent is prescribed under the applicable Prescription Act.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's obligation arose from the partnership relationship and thus qualifies for suspension of prescription under the 1943 Act.
  3. 3 How the entry or exit of partners affects the running or suspension of prescription in claims between partners.

Ratio Decidendi

The majority held that the appellant's claim for R5000 as goodwill value was a right arising from the partnership relationship, as it was integral to the partnership agreement and its existence depended on the partnership. The court found that the wording of the Prescription Act 18 of 1943, specifically the definition of 'person under disability' in relation to partners, was ambiguous regarding the effect of changes in partnership composition. The majority adopted a purposive interpretation, concluding that prescription should be suspended for as long as the litigating partners remained in partnership with each other, regardless of the entry or exit of other partners. This interpretation...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; special plea of prescription dismissed; respondent granted leave to plead on the merits.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed with costs.
  • The order of the magistrates' court is set aside and substituted with: 'The special plea is dismissed with costs.'