Van Wyk v S , Galela v S (20273/2014 , 20448/2014) [2014] ZASCA 152; [2014] 4 All SA 708 (SCA); 2015 (1) SACR 584 (SCA) (29 September 2014)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that, following the enactment of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013, special leave to appeal is required from the SCA in criminal matters where the high court has dismissed an appeal or refused a petition for leave to appeal. The high court does not have jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the SCA in these circumstances. In Van Wyk, the SCA found that the sentence imposed was so disproportionate and shocking that no reasonable court could have imposed it, and that special circumstances existed, namely that refusal of leave would result in a manifest denial of justice. The appellant had already served a sufficient period of imprisonment. In Galela, the...
- Citation
- [2014] ZASCA 152
- Parties
- Appellant: Hendrick Van Wyk; Appellant: Bonile Galela; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2014
- Case Number
- 20273/2014 , 20448/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court of Appeal Judgment on Special Leave to Appeal and Merits
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal granted in Van Wyk v The State; appeal upheld and sentence reduced. Special leave to appeal refused in Galela v The State.
- Judges
- Navsa, Brand, Ponnan, Swain, Mathopo
- Legal Topics
- Special Leave to Appeal, Criminal Procedure Act, Superior Courts Act, Sentencing Disparity, Rape, Sexual Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hendrick Van Wyk
Appellant
Bonile Galela
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court of Appeal Judgment on Special Leave to Appeal and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant special leave to appeal in criminal matters where the high court dismissed an appeal or refused a petition for leave to appeal.
- 2 Whether the sentences imposed by the trial courts were disproportionate and justified interference by the appellate court.
- 3 Whether special circumstances exist to justify granting special leave to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that, following the enactment of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013, special leave to appeal is required from the SCA in criminal matters where the high court has dismissed an appeal or refused a petition for leave to appeal. The high court does not have jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the SCA in these circumstances. In Van Wyk, the SCA found that the sentence imposed was so disproportionate and shocking that no reasonable court could have imposed it, and that special circumstances existed, namely that refusal of leave would result in a manifest denial of justice. The appellant had already served a sufficient period of imprisonment. In Galela, the...
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal granted in Van Wyk v The State; appeal upheld and sentence reduced. Special leave to appeal refused in Galela v The State.
Orders
- The appellant Hendrick Van Wyk is granted special leave to appeal against the sentence imposed by the Regional Court, Pretoria-North, confirmed on appeal by the North Gauteng High Court.
- The appeal of Hendrick Van Wyk is upheld. The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted with the following: The sentence imposed by the trial court is set aside and the following sentence is substituted: The appellant is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of three years five months and 28 days. The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment