Vanchem Vanadium Products (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Members (JA33/16) [2016] ZALAC 62; (2017) 38 ILJ 926 (LAC) (8 December 2016)
The Labour Appeal Court found that, despite the appellant's exclusion from the Main Agreement by clause 1(3)(e), the parties had by their conduct and through the January 2011 collective agreement incorporated the terms of the Main Agreement into their employment relationship. The purported cancellation of the collective agreement by the respondent was disputed and not validly effected, as the alleged breach was unspecified and contested. Subsequent agreements and the parties' conduct, including reference to the Main Agreement in disputes, payment of benefit fund contributions, and registration with the MEIBC, confirmed the ongoing binding effect of the Main Agreement. The Labour Court...
- Citation
- [2016] ZALAC 62
- Parties
- Appellant: Vanchem Vanadium Products (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Members
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 2016
- Case Number
- JA33/16
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Labour Court's order set aside and replaced with dismissal of the application.
- Judges
- Tlaletsi, Coppin, Landman
- Legal Topics
- Collective Agreements, Main Agreement Binding Effect, Lay Off and Short Time, Contractual Incorporation, Termination of Collective Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vanchem Vanadium Products (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Members
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant and respondent's members are bound by the terms of the Main Agreement of the Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council.
- 2 Whether the appellant had the right to implement lay-offs and short-time under the Main Agreement.
- 3 Whether the January 2011 collective agreement was validly cancelled by the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court found that, despite the appellant's exclusion from the Main Agreement by clause 1(3)(e), the parties had by their conduct and through the January 2011 collective agreement incorporated the terms of the Main Agreement into their employment relationship. The purported cancellation of the collective agreement by the respondent was disputed and not validly effected, as the alleged breach was unspecified and contested. Subsequent agreements and the parties' conduct, including reference to the Main Agreement in disputes, payment of benefit fund contributions, and registration with the MEIBC, confirmed the ongoing binding effect of the Main Agreement. The Labour Court...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Labour Court's order set aside and replaced with dismissal of the application.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld and the order of the Labour Court is set aside and replaced with: 'The application is dismissed.'
- The respondent is to pay the costs of the appeal, including the costs of employing two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment