Venter and Others v Van Rensburg and Others (2121/2017) [2017] ZAGPPHC 906 (11 April 2017)
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully dispossessed of their residence and businesses by the respondents, who padlocked the premises and prevented access. The respondents failed to prove true impossibility of restoring possession, as the residence and property remained in a habitable state and their belongings were still stored there. The court held that mere refurbishment or partial reconstruction does not preclude restoration under the mandament van spolie. The interim interdict granted was temporal and not final in effect, thus not appealable. Exceptional circumstances were established due to ongoing irreparable harm suffered by the applicants, including financial...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPPHC 906
- Parties
- Applicant: Doreen Venter; Applicant: Jacoba Johanna Dorothea du Plessis; Applicant: Colosseum Arabian Stud (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Doreen Venter N.O (as trustee of the Doreen Venter Family Trust); Applicant: Colosseum Reale (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Andries Gerhardus van Rensburg; Respondent: Millenium Body Guards; Respondent: Johan Lemmer
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2017
- Case Number
- 2121/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and S 18 Application for Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; application for execution pending appeal granted; judgment and order not suspended pending appeal.
- Judges
- N V Khumalo
- Legal Topics
- Mandament Van Spolie, Interim Interdict, Impossibility of Performance, Exceptional Circumstances, Execution Pending Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Doreen Venter
Applicant
Jacoba Johanna Dorothea du Plessis
Applicant
Colosseum Arabian Stud (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Doreen Venter N.O (as trustee of the Doreen Venter Family Trust)
Applicant
Colosseum Reale (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Andries Gerhardus van Rensburg
Respondent
Millenium Body Guards
Respondent
Johan Lemmer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and S 18 Application for Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court erred in granting a spoliation order restoring possession of the property and residence to the applicants.
- 2 Whether the interim interdict granted is final in effect and therefore appealable.
- 3 Whether impossibility of performance precluded the granting of the mandament van spolie.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully dispossessed of their residence and businesses by the respondents, who padlocked the premises and prevented access. The respondents failed to prove true impossibility of restoring possession, as the residence and property remained in a habitable state and their belongings were still stored there. The court held that mere refurbishment or partial reconstruction does not preclude restoration under the mandament van spolie. The interim interdict granted was temporal and not final in effect, thus not appealable. Exceptional circumstances were established due to ongoing irreparable harm suffered by the applicants, including financial...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; application for execution pending appeal granted; judgment and order not suspended pending appeal.
Orders
- Leave to appeal the order for both spoliation and temporary interdicts is refused.
- The application to implement the order delivered on 6 and 9 March 2017 is granted with costs; the judgment and order will not be suspended pending determination of any appeal process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment