Venter NO and Another v Murimuthu and Others (D10106/22) [2025] ZAKZDHC 20 (7 May 2025)
The respondents failed to establish any lawful right to occupy the apartment owned by Jubilee Plant Hire SA CC (in liquidation). The applicants, as joint liquidators, are entitled to vacant possession to realise the asset for the benefit of creditors. The procedural requirements of the Prevention of Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act were satisfied, including service of the s 4(2) notice, and the respondents suffered no prejudice. No factual or legal defence was raised by the respondents. It is just and equitable to order their eviction, given their means and the extended period of unlawful occupation. Costs are awarded on an attorney and client scale due to the...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAKZDHC 20
- Parties
- Applicant: Jacobus Willem Venter N.O.; Applicant: Justi Stroh N.O.; Respondent: Lovendran Marimuthu; Respondent: Ramona Budden; Respondent: eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Kwazulu-Natal
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2025
- Case Number
- D10106/22
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Order on Eviction Application
- Outcome
- Application granted; respondents ordered to vacate the apartment by 30 June 2025, failing which the sheriff is authorised to evict them. Costs awarded against first and second respondents on an attorney and client scale, including previously reserved costs.
- Judges
- Mossop
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Occupation, Eviction, Prevention of Eviction From and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act, Liquidation Asset Realisation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacobus Willem Venter N.O.
Applicant
Justi Stroh N.O.
Applicant
Lovendran Marimuthu
Respondent
Ramona Budden
Respondent
eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Kwazulu-Natal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Order on Eviction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are in unlawful occupation of the apartment owned by Jubilee Plant Hire SA CC (in liquidation).
- 2 Whether the procedural requirements of the Prevention of Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 were complied with.
- 3 Whether the respondents have any lawful right to remain in occupation of the apartment.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents failed to establish any lawful right to occupy the apartment owned by Jubilee Plant Hire SA CC (in liquidation). The applicants, as joint liquidators, are entitled to vacant possession to realise the asset for the benefit of creditors. The procedural requirements of the Prevention of Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act were satisfied, including service of the s 4(2) notice, and the respondents suffered no prejudice. No factual or legal defence was raised by the respondents. It is just and equitable to order their eviction, given their means and the extended period of unlawful occupation. Costs are awarded on an attorney and client scale due to the...
Court Disposition
Application granted; respondents ordered to vacate the apartment by 30 June 2025, failing which the sheriff is authorised to evict them. Costs awarded against first and second respondents on an attorney and client scale, including previously reserved costs.
Orders
- The first and second respondents, and any person occupying through them, are ordered to vacate the apartment by 30 June 2025.
- If the first and second respondents fail to vacate, the sheriff is directed to eject and evict them and any person claiming occupation through them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment