Vodacom Proprietary Limited and Another v Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited and Another (5 February 2024) (LM148Dec21 / CNF 119 Nov 23) [2024] ZACT 4 (5 February 2024)
The Tribunal held that the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access all information claimed as confidential by Frogfoot in the Competition Commission's merger report, provided they sign confidentiality undertakings. The Tribunal established a regime whereby such information must be made available for inspection in unredacted form, with unrestricted rights of inspection and note-taking, and in locations convenient to the advisors. If Frogfoot refuses access to specific information, it must provide reasons within five business days, and the merger parties may approach the Tribunal on an urgent basis for relief. The Tribunal found that this approach balances the need for...
- Citation
- [2024] ZACT 4
- Parties
- Applicant: Vodacom Proprietary Limited; Applicant: Business Venture Investments No 2213 Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Competition Commission of South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2024
- Case Number
- LM148Dec21 / CNF 119 Nov 23
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Law Application / Order on Confidentiality and Access to Information in Merger Proceedings
- Outcome
- Order granted regulating access to confidential information in merger proceedings.
- Judges
- Andreas Wessels, Thando Vilakazi, Anisa Kessery
- Legal Topics
- Confidential Information in Merger, Access to Evidence, Merger Proceedings, Competition Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vodacom Proprietary Limited
Applicant
Business Venture Investments No 2213 Proprietary Limited
Applicant
Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited
Respondent
Competition Commission of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Competition Law Application / Order on Confidentiality and Access to Information in Merger Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access information claimed as confidential by Frogfoot in the Competition Commission's merger report.
- 2 What regime should govern inspection and access to confidential information in the context of merger proceedings before the Competition Tribunal.
- 3 Whether Frogfoot's refusal to provide access to certain confidential information is justified and what recourse is available to the merger parties.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access all information claimed as confidential by Frogfoot in the Competition Commission's merger report, provided they sign confidentiality undertakings. The Tribunal established a regime whereby such information must be made available for inspection in unredacted form, with unrestricted rights of inspection and note-taking, and in locations convenient to the advisors. If Frogfoot refuses access to specific information, it must provide reasons within five business days, and the merger parties may approach the Tribunal on an urgent basis for relief. The Tribunal found that this approach balances the need for...
Court Disposition
Order granted regulating access to confidential information in merger proceedings.
Orders
- Frogfoot must provide the merger parties' independent advisors who have signed confidentiality undertakings with access to all information claimed as confidential in the Competition Commission's merger report.
- The Competition Commission is permitted to provide such advisors with access to unredacted copies of all relevant paragraphs in its merger report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment