Vodacom Proprietary Limited and Another v Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited and Another (5 February 2024) (LM148Dec21 / CNF 119 Nov 23) [2024] ZACT 4 (5 February 2024)

Vodacom Proprietary Limited and Another v Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited and Another (5 February 2024) (LM148Dec21 / CNF 119 Nov 23) [2024] ZACT 4 (5 February 2024)

The Tribunal held that the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access all information claimed as confidential by Frogfoot in the Competition Commission's merger report, provided they sign confidentiality undertakings. The Tribunal established a regime whereby such information must be made available for inspection in unredacted form, with unrestricted rights of inspection and note-taking, and in locations convenient to the advisors. If Frogfoot refuses access to specific information, it must provide reasons within five business days, and the merger parties may approach the Tribunal on an urgent basis for relief. The Tribunal found that this approach balances the need for...

Citation
[2024] ZACT 4
Parties
Applicant: Vodacom Proprietary Limited; Applicant: Business Venture Investments No 2213 Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Competition Commission of South Africa
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 February 2024
Case Number
LM148Dec21 / CNF 119 Nov 23
Procedural Posture
Competition Law Application / Order on Confidentiality and Access to Information in Merger Proceedings
Outcome
Order granted regulating access to confidential information in merger proceedings.
Judges
Andreas Wessels, Thando Vilakazi, Anisa Kessery
Legal Topics
Confidential Information in Merger, Access to Evidence, Merger Proceedings, Competition Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vodacom Proprietary Limited

Applicant

Business Venture Investments No 2213 Proprietary Limited

Applicant

Frogfoot Networks Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Competition Commission of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Competition Law Application / Order on Confidentiality and Access to Information in Merger Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access information claimed as confidential by Frogfoot in the Competition Commission's merger report.
  2. 2 What regime should govern inspection and access to confidential information in the context of merger proceedings before the Competition Tribunal.
  3. 3 Whether Frogfoot's refusal to provide access to certain confidential information is justified and what recourse is available to the merger parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access all information claimed as confidential by Frogfoot in the Competition Commission's merger report, provided they sign confidentiality undertakings. The Tribunal established a regime whereby such information must be made available for inspection in unredacted form, with unrestricted rights of inspection and note-taking, and in locations convenient to the advisors. If Frogfoot refuses access to specific information, it must provide reasons within five business days, and the merger parties may approach the Tribunal on an urgent basis for relief. The Tribunal found that this approach balances the need for...

Court Disposition

Order granted regulating access to confidential information in merger proceedings.

Orders

  • Frogfoot must provide the merger parties' independent advisors who have signed confidentiality undertakings with access to all information claimed as confidential in the Competition Commission's merger report.
  • The Competition Commission is permitted to provide such advisors with access to unredacted copies of all relevant paragraphs in its merger report.