Vodacom Proprietary Limited and Another v Vox Telecommunications Proprietary Limited and Another (LM148Dec21 / CNF120Nov23) [2024] ZACT 5 (5 February 2024)
The Tribunal held that the merger parties' independent advisors, upon signing appropriate confidentiality undertakings, are entitled to access all information claimed as confidential by Vox in the Competition Commission's merger report, except for information in paragraph 376 and the letter dated 21 March 2022. For these, Vox may redact highly sensitive information and provide a redacted version for inspection. The Tribunal established a regime for inspection and access, requiring Vox to consider requests for access in good faith and respond within five business days. If access is refused, reasons must be provided, and the merger parties may approach the Tribunal on an urgent basis. The...
- Citation
- [2024] ZACT 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Vodacom Proprietary Limited; Applicant: Business Venture Investments No 2213 Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Vox Telecommunications Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Competition Commission of South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2024
- Case Number
- LM148Dec21 / CNF120Nov23
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Law Application / Order on Confidentiality and Access to Information in Merger Proceedings
- Outcome
- Order granted regulating access to confidential information in the merger proceedings.
- Judges
- Andreas Wessels, Thando Vilakazi, Anisa Kessery
- Legal Topics
- Confidential Information in Merger, Access to Evidence, Inspection Rights, Competition Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vodacom Proprietary Limited
Applicant
Business Venture Investments No 2213 Proprietary Limited
Applicant
Vox Telecommunications Proprietary Limited
Respondent
Competition Commission of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Competition Law Application / Order on Confidentiality and Access to Information in Merger Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the merger parties' independent advisors are entitled to access confidential information claimed by Vox in the Competition Commission's merger report.
- 2 What regime should govern inspection and access to highly competitively sensitive information.
- 3 Whether the process for requesting and granting access to confidential information is fair and sufficient.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the merger parties' independent advisors, upon signing appropriate confidentiality undertakings, are entitled to access all information claimed as confidential by Vox in the Competition Commission's merger report, except for information in paragraph 376 and the letter dated 21 March 2022. For these, Vox may redact highly sensitive information and provide a redacted version for inspection. The Tribunal established a regime for inspection and access, requiring Vox to consider requests for access in good faith and respond within five business days. If access is refused, reasons must be provided, and the merger parties may approach the Tribunal on an urgent basis. The...
Court Disposition
Order granted regulating access to confidential information in the merger proceedings.
Orders
- Vox must provide the merger parties' independent advisors who have signed confidentiality undertakings with access to all confidential information in the Competition Commission's merger report, except for information in paragraph 376 and the letter dated 21 March 2022.
- Vox must furnish a redacted version of paragraph 376 and the letter dated 21 March 2022, redacting highly competitively sensitive information.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment