Volkswagen Financial Services SA (Pty) Ltd v National Credit Regulator (NCT/94937/2017/56(1)) [2019] ZANCT 175 (4 April 2019)
The Tribunal found that the applicant, as credit provider, is responsible under the National Credit Act for ensuring that only permissible fees are charged to consumers in credit agreements. The 'on the road', administrative, and handling fees are not included in the closed list of charges permitted by sections 101 and 102 of the NCA and thus constitute prohibited charges under section 100(1)(a). The applicant's argument that these fees were simply passed through from the dealer was rejected; the credit agreement itself imposed these charges on consumers. Furthermore, the fees were inaccurately disclosed as 'Service & Delivery Charge' in the credit agreement, which misled consumers and...
- Citation
- [2019] ZANCT 175
- Parties
- Applicant: Volkswagen Financial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: National Credit Regulator
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2019
- Case Number
- NCT/94937/2017/56(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Determination After Hearing
- Outcome
- The compliance notice issued against the applicant is confirmed as modified. The applicant is ordered to cease charging the impugned fees, refund affected consumers, and submit audited reports. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- D Terblanche, M Peenze, B Dumisa
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act Compliance, Prohibited Credit Fees, Consumer Protection, Disclosure Requirements, Principal Debt Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Volkswagen Financial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
National Credit Regulator
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Determination After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant charged consumers 'on the road', administrative, and handling fees in contravention of the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether such fees are permitted to be charged or included in the principal debt under sections 100, 101, and 102 of the NCA.
- 3 Whether the fees were inaccurately or misleadingly disclosed in credit agreements contrary to section 92(2) of the NCA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicant, as credit provider, is responsible under the National Credit Act for ensuring that only permissible fees are charged to consumers in credit agreements. The 'on the road', administrative, and handling fees are not included in the closed list of charges permitted by sections 101 and 102 of the NCA and thus constitute prohibited charges under section 100(1)(a). The applicant's argument that these fees were simply passed through from the dealer was rejected; the credit agreement itself imposed these charges on consumers. Furthermore, the fees were inaccurately disclosed as 'Service & Delivery Charge' in the credit agreement, which misled consumers and...
Court Disposition
The compliance notice issued against the applicant is confirmed as modified. The applicant is ordered to cease charging the impugned fees, refund affected consumers, and submit audited reports. No order as to costs.
Orders
- From 10 April 2019, the applicant must cease charging consumers 'on the road', administrative, and handling fees on credit agreements and submit written confirmation to the respondent by 25 April 2019.
- The applicant must submit a list of all consumers charged these fees since 2007, including the number of consumers and total amount charged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment