Volkwyn and Another v Fredericks (21184/2022) [2024] ZAWCHC 348 (5 November 2024)
The Court found that the First Applicant was entitled to purchase the Respondent's member's interest and loan account in the CC at a fair value to be determined by an independent chartered accountant. The valuation must consider transformation objectives, requiring the appointment of a valuer from a previously disadvantaged group, and the CC's status as a small business. The costs of the valuation are to be borne by the CC and included in the valuation, while legal costs paid by the CC for the application are excluded from the valuation. Each party is to pay its own legal costs for the application and counterapplication. The Court rejected the parties' attempts to mutually appoint a...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAWCHC 348
- Parties
- Applicant: Washief Volkwyn; Applicant: The Network Computer Services Western Cape CC; Respondent: Elvina Fredericks
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2024
- Case Number
- 21184/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Urgent Application and Counterapplication
- Outcome
- Application granted. The First Applicant is directed to purchase the Respondent's member's interest and loan account in the CC at a fair value determined by an independent valuer. Each party to pay its own costs.
- Judges
- A Bhoopchand
- Legal Topics
- Member Interest Purchase, Valuation of Business, Transformation Objectives, Costs of Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Washief Volkwyn
Applicant
The Network Computer Services Western Cape CC
Applicant
Elvina Fredericks
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Urgent Application and Counterapplication
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Applicant is entitled to purchase the Respondent's member's interest in the CC.
- 2 How the fair value of the member's interest and loan account should be determined.
- 3 Who should bear the costs of the valuation and the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the First Applicant was entitled to purchase the Respondent's member's interest and loan account in the CC at a fair value to be determined by an independent chartered accountant. The valuation must consider transformation objectives, requiring the appointment of a valuer from a previously disadvantaged group, and the CC's status as a small business. The costs of the valuation are to be borne by the CC and included in the valuation, while legal costs paid by the CC for the application are excluded from the valuation. Each party is to pay its own legal costs for the application and counterapplication. The Court rejected the parties' attempts to mutually appoint a...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The First Applicant is directed to purchase the Respondent's member's interest and loan account in the CC at a fair value determined by an independent valuer. Each party to pay its own costs.
Orders
- The First Applicant is directed to purchase the Respondent's member's interest and loan account in the Second Applicant at a fair value as specified in paragraphs 2 to 9.
- Valuation to be undertaken by a practising chartered accountant of not less than 10 years standing, nominated by the President or Chairman of the Cape Town Regional Association of SAICA, considering transformation and the CC's small business status.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment