Von Schimper v Monastery Diamond Mining Corporation Ltd (551/2006) [2007] ZAFSHC 24 (9 March 2007)
The court held that the affidavits of the provisional liquidators were irrelevant to the proceedings before it, as the application for costs de bonis propriis was not against the company in liquidation but against individuals acting in a representative capacity. Section 359(1)(a) of the Companies Act only suspends proceedings against the company, not against its directors or attorneys personally. The court found that it had jurisdiction to make a costs order against Van Jaarsveld and STRB, regardless of their residence or business location, as the costs arose from litigation conducted before it. However, the applicant withdrew the application against STRB after accepting their...
- Citation
- [2007] ZAFSHC 24
- Parties
- Applicant: F.J. Von M Schimper; Respondent: Monastery Diamond Mining Corporation Ltd; Respondent: Auret Pritchard Van Jaarsveld; Respondent: Smith Tabata Buchanan Boyes (STRB); Respondent: Petrus Jacobus Maryn Van Staden; Respondent: Yusuf Ebrahim
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2007
- Case Number
- 551/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Costs De Bonis Propriis Following Liquidation and Interlocutory Proceedings
- Outcome
- The application to strike out the affidavits of the provisional liquidators was granted with costs. The application for a costs order de bonis propriis against Van Jaarsveld and STRB was dismissed. Each party was ordered to pay their own costs.
- Judges
- C.J. Musi
- Legal Topics
- Costs De Bonis Propriis, Company Liquidation, Jurisdiction of Cost Orders, Interlocutory Applications, Representative Capacity, Notice and Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F.J. Von M Schimper
Applicant
Monastery Diamond Mining Corporation Ltd
Respondent
Auret Pritchard Van Jaarsveld
Respondent
Smith Tabata Buchanan Boyes (STRB)
Respondent
Petrus Jacobus Maryn Van Staden
Respondent
Yusuf Ebrahim
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Costs De Bonis Propriis Following Liquidation and Interlocutory Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affidavits of the provisional liquidators should be struck out with costs.
- 2 Whether Van Jaarsveld and STRB attorneys should be ordered to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal de bonis propriis.
- 3 Whether the proceedings against Van Jaarsveld and STRB are affected by the suspension of proceedings under section 359(1)(a) of the Companies Act due to liquidation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the affidavits of the provisional liquidators were irrelevant to the proceedings before it, as the application for costs de bonis propriis was not against the company in liquidation but against individuals acting in a representative capacity. Section 359(1)(a) of the Companies Act only suspends proceedings against the company, not against its directors or attorneys personally. The court found that it had jurisdiction to make a costs order against Van Jaarsveld and STRB, regardless of their residence or business location, as the costs arose from litigation conducted before it. However, the applicant withdrew the application against STRB after accepting their...
Court Disposition
The application to strike out the affidavits of the provisional liquidators was granted with costs. The application for a costs order de bonis propriis against Van Jaarsveld and STRB was dismissed. Each party was ordered to pay their own costs.
Orders
- The affidavits of the provisional liquidators Petrus Jacobus Maryn Van Staden and Yusuf Ebrahim are struck out with costs.
- The application for Van Jaarsveld and STRB attorneys to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal de bonis propriis is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment