Vorster N.O v Buthelezi and Others (10754/2022P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 109; [2023] 4 All SA 889 (KZP) (13 October 2023)
The court found that the first to fourth respondents, as trustees, distributed substantial trust funds to themselves, their relatives, and associated entities, in a manner inconsistent with the charitable objectives of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust. The trust deed provides for reasonable remuneration and expenses, but not for large gratuities or project payments to trustees and their associates. The respondents failed to demonstrate any legitimate basis for such payments, and their conduct was prejudicial to the trust and its beneficiaries. The court held that the original beneficiaries do not enjoy a preference over other beneficiaries, and the trust is not a trading trust. The...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAKZPHC 109
- Parties
- Applicant: Benjamin Jacobus Vorster N.O; Respondent: Felix Khulekani Buthelezi; Respondent: Ephraim Mfuneni Zungu; Respondent: Nontobeko Precious Angela Buthelezi; Respondent: Nomusa Zethu Qunta; Respondent: Mabutho Miya N.O; Respondent: Cynthia Themba Khumalo N.O; Respondent: The Master of the Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2023
- Case Number
- 10754/2022P
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application for Removal of Trustees
- Outcome
- Application granted. The first to fourth respondents are removed as trustees of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust.
- Judges
- E Bezuidenhout
- Legal Topics
- Trust Property Control Act, Removal of Trustee, Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, Trustee Remuneration, Charitable Trust Objects
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Jacobus Vorster N.O
Applicant
Felix Khulekani Buthelezi
Respondent
Ephraim Mfuneni Zungu
Respondent
Nontobeko Precious Angela Buthelezi
Respondent
Nomusa Zethu Qunta
Respondent
Mabutho Miya N.O
Respondent
Cynthia Themba Khumalo N.O
Respondent
The Master of the Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment on Application for Removal of Trustees
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first to fourth respondents, as trustees, were entitled to pay or distribute trust funds to themselves and related parties.
- 2 Whether the payments made by the trustees were in accordance with the trust deed and the objectives of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust.
- 3 Whether the conduct of the first to fourth respondents justified their removal as trustees under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first to fourth respondents, as trustees, distributed substantial trust funds to themselves, their relatives, and associated entities, in a manner inconsistent with the charitable objectives of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust. The trust deed provides for reasonable remuneration and expenses, but not for large gratuities or project payments to trustees and their associates. The respondents failed to demonstrate any legitimate basis for such payments, and their conduct was prejudicial to the trust and its beneficiaries. The court held that the original beneficiaries do not enjoy a preference over other beneficiaries, and the trust is not a trading trust. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The first to fourth respondents are removed as trustees of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust.
Orders
- The first, second, third and fourth respondents’ powers to act as trustees of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust are suspended.
- The first, second, third and fourth respondents are removed as trustees of the Ubunye Be Afrika Development Trust with immediate effect and are directed to return their letters of authority to the seventh respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment