Vryburg High School and Another v Head of Department, Deoartment of Education, North West Province and Others (M12/2014) [2015] ZANWHC 6 (5 March 2015)

Vryburg High School and Another v Head of Department, Deoartment of Education, North West Province and Others (M12/2014) [2015] ZANWHC 6 (5 March 2015)

The court found that, despite the applicants' argument that the matter had become moot due to the unavailability of the preferred candidates, the merits of the application were argued extensively. The court was not persuaded that the matter should be treated as moot and instead determined that there were no merits in the application for review. The application was dismissed. Regarding costs, the court rejected the applicants' argument that costs should not be awarded against them due to the nature of the parties involved. The court held that the applicants and respondents are distinct entities with separate financial responsibilities, and the Fifth Respondent had incurred costs in...

Citation
[2015] ZANWHC 6
Parties
Applicant: Vryburg High School; Applicant: The Governing Body of the Vryburg High School; Respondent: The Head of Department, Department of Education, North West Province; Respondent: The Member of the Executive Council; Respondent: Department of Education, North West Province; Respondent: Petrus Paulus Steyn; Respondent: Dawie Mathee; Respondent: Mandlenkosi Barry Fuleni
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 March 2015
Case Number
M12/2014
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Judges
R D Hendricks
Legal Topics
Review of Administrative Action, Appointment of School Principal, Costs Order, Mootness
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Review of Administrative Action Appointment of School Principal Costs Order Mootness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vryburg High School

Applicant

The Governing Body of the Vryburg High School

Applicant

The Head of Department, Department of Education, North West Province

Respondent

The Member of the Executive Council

Respondent

Department of Education, North West Province

Respondent

Petrus Paulus Steyn

Respondent

Dawie Mathee

Respondent

Mandlenkosi Barry Fuleni

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the decision of the First Respondent to appoint the Fifth Respondent as principal of Vryburg High School should be reviewed and set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the Third Respondent should be appointed as principal instead.
  3. 3 Whether the application had become moot due to the unavailability of the preferred candidates.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite the applicants' argument that the matter had become moot due to the unavailability of the preferred candidates, the merits of the application were argued extensively. The court was not persuaded that the matter should be treated as moot and instead determined that there were no merits in the application for review. The application was dismissed. Regarding costs, the court rejected the applicants' argument that costs should not be awarded against them due to the nature of the parties involved. The court held that the applicants and respondents are distinct entities with separate financial responsibilities, and the Fifth Respondent had incurred costs in...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The applicants are ordered to pay the costs of the application jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.