Vukile Property Fund Limited v Pan Africa Shopping Centre (LM112Sep22) [2022] ZACT 88 (12 December 2022)

Vukile Property Fund Limited v Pan Africa Shopping Centre (LM112Sep22) [2022] ZACT 88 (12 December 2022)

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger results in a horizontal overlap in the market for rentable community shopping centres within 10 km of Pan Africa, but the merged entity's post-merger market share would be approximately 4.5%, with an accretion of 1.3%. The presence of several competing shopping centres in the area would continue to constrain the merged entity. No vertical overlap or pre-existing relationship was identified. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's assessment that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal noted that no retrenchments would occur and job opportunities would be created through...

Citation
[2022] ZACT 88
Parties
Applicant: Vukile Property Fund Limited; Respondent: Pan Africa Shopping Centre
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 December 2022
Case Number
LM112Sep22
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Reasons for Decision
Outcome
Merger approved unconditionally.
Judges
Shaista Goga, Fiona Tregenna, Mondo Mazwai
Legal Topics
Large Merger, Horizontal Overlap, Public Interest, Hdp Shareholding, Employment Effects
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Large Merger Horizontal Overlap Public Interest Hdp Shareholding Employment Effects

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vukile Property Fund Limited

Applicant

Pan Africa Shopping Centre

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Approval / Reasons for Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the transaction raises public interest concerns, including effects on employment and HDP shareholding.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger results in a horizontal overlap in the market for rentable community shopping centres within 10 km of Pan Africa, but the merged entity's post-merger market share would be approximately 4.5%, with an accretion of 1.3%. The presence of several competing shopping centres in the area would continue to constrain the merged entity. No vertical overlap or pre-existing relationship was identified. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's assessment that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal noted that no retrenchments would occur and job opportunities would be created through...

Court Disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.