W J v S C (43927/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 127; 2019 (6) SA 168 (GJ) (11 April 2019)

W J v S C (43927/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 127; 2019 (6) SA 168 (GJ) (11 April 2019)

The court found that the applicant's decision to relocate to New Zealand was bona fide and reasonable, motivated by the prospect of a better life and stability for herself and the minor child. The respondent did not provide a substantive challenge to the applicant's assertions, nor did he present expert evidence identifying specific concerns regarding the child's welfare. The court held that the best interests of the child are paramount and that the applicant had made sufficient undertakings to maintain the child's relationship with the respondent. The urgency of the matter and the practical arrangements required for emigration further supported granting the relief. Accordingly, the court...

Citation
[2019] ZAGPJHC 127
Parties
Applicant: W J; Respondent: S, C
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 April 2019
Case Number
43927/2018
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / First Instance
Outcome
Application granted; respondent's consent to the minor child's emigration dispensed with.
Judges
WHG van der Linde
Legal Topics
Relocation of Minor, Guardianship Consent, Best Interests of Child, Children's Act Section 18, Parental Rights, Emigration
Family and Children Relocation of Minor Guardianship Consent Best Interests of Child Children's Act Section 18 Parental Rights Emigration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W J

Applicant

S, C

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's decision to relocate with the minor child to New Zealand is bona fide and reasonable.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's refusal to consent to the child's emigration is reasonable or mala fide.
  3. 3 Whether expert evidence is necessary to determine the best interests of the child in this relocation context.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's decision to relocate to New Zealand was bona fide and reasonable, motivated by the prospect of a better life and stability for herself and the minor child. The respondent did not provide a substantive challenge to the applicant's assertions, nor did he present expert evidence identifying specific concerns regarding the child's welfare. The court held that the best interests of the child are paramount and that the applicant had made sufficient undertakings to maintain the child's relationship with the respondent. The urgency of the matter and the practical arrangements required for emigration further supported granting the relief. Accordingly, the court...

Court Disposition

Application granted; respondent's consent to the minor child's emigration dispensed with.

Orders

  • The respondent's consent to the minor child's removal from the Republic of South Africa to New Zealand is dispensed with.
  • The applicant is authorised to apply for and obtain all necessary travel documents and visas for the minor child to relocate to New Zealand.