Walmart Stores Inc v Massmart Holdings Ltd (73/LM/Dec10) [2011] ZACT 28 (31 May 2011)

Walmart Stores Inc v Massmart Holdings Ltd (73/LM/Dec10) [2011] ZACT 28 (31 May 2011)

The Tribunal found that the merger did not substantially prevent or lessen competition but raised significant public interest concerns, particularly regarding employment and local supplier development. To address these concerns, the Tribunal imposed conditions prohibiting merger-related retrenchments for two years, requiring preferential re-employment of previously retrenched employees, and mandating the honouring of existing labour agreements. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered the establishment of a R100 million programme to develop local South African suppliers, including SMMEs, and required annual reporting to the Competition Commission. These conditions were deemed necessary and...

Citation
[2011] ZACT 28
Parties
Applicant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc; Respondent: Massmart Holdings Limited
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 May 2011
Case Number
73/LM/Nov10
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Final Determination
Outcome
Merger approved subject to public interest conditions.
Judges
N Manoim, Y Carrim, A Wessels
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Public Interest Conditions, Employment Protection, Local Supplier Development
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Merger Control Public Interest Conditions Employment Protection Local Supplier Development

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wal-Mart Stores Inc

Applicant

Massmart Holdings Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Application / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger between Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Massmart Holdings Limited should be approved under the Competition Act.
  2. 2 What public interest conditions, if any, should be imposed on the merger, particularly regarding employment and local supplier development.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the merger did not substantially prevent or lessen competition but raised significant public interest concerns, particularly regarding employment and local supplier development. To address these concerns, the Tribunal imposed conditions prohibiting merger-related retrenchments for two years, requiring preferential re-employment of previously retrenched employees, and mandating the honouring of existing labour agreements. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered the establishment of a R100 million programme to develop local South African suppliers, including SMMEs, and required annual reporting to the Competition Commission. These conditions were deemed necessary and...

Court Disposition

Merger approved subject to public interest conditions.

Orders

  • The merger between Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Massmart Holdings Limited is approved subject to the conditions set out in the order.
  • No retrenchments based on operational requirements resulting from the merger for two years from the effective date.