Ward and Another v Suit and Others In Re: Gurr v Zambia Airways Corporation Ltd. (51/96) [1998] ZASCA 16; [1998] 2 All SA 479 (A) (23 March 1998)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 344(g) of the Companies Act confers jurisdiction on South African courts to grant a winding-up order for an external company, even if it is already being wound up in its country of incorporation. The appellants failed to intervene timeously, did not oppose the granting of the final winding-up order, and did not provide a satisfactory explanation for their delay. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying the setting aside of the winding-up order under section 354(1). The limited recognition granted to the appellants as foreign liquidators did not affect the powers of the locally appointed liquidator. The appeal was dismissed, and...
- Citation
- [1998] ZASCA 16
- Parties
- Appellant: John Stanley Ward; Appellant: Nicholas Charles Allen; Respondent: Gordon Suit; Respondent: Robert Edwin Gurr; Respondent: The Master of the Supreme Court (Transvaal Provincial Division); Respondent: Zambia Airways Corporation Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 1998
- Case Number
- 51/96
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Witwatersrand Local Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Mahomed, Eksteen, Scott, Zulman, Stretcher
- Legal Topics
- External Company Liquidation, Recognition of Foreign Liquidators, Concursus Creditorum, Winding Up Orders, Jurisdiction of Sa Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Stanley Ward
Appellant
Nicholas Charles Allen
Appellant
Gordon Suit
Respondent
Robert Edwin Gurr
Respondent
The Master of the Supreme Court (Transvaal Provincial Division)
Respondent
Zambia Airways Corporation Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Witwatersrand Local Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a South African court has jurisdiction to grant a winding-up order for an external company already in voluntary liquidation in its country of incorporation.
- 2 Whether the appellants, as foreign liquidators, should be recognised and empowered to administer the South African estate of the company.
- 3 Whether the final winding-up order granted in South Africa should be set aside under section 354(1) of the Companies Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 344(g) of the Companies Act confers jurisdiction on South African courts to grant a winding-up order for an external company, even if it is already being wound up in its country of incorporation. The appellants failed to intervene timeously, did not oppose the granting of the final winding-up order, and did not provide a satisfactory explanation for their delay. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying the setting aside of the winding-up order under section 354(1). The limited recognition granted to the appellants as foreign liquidators did not affect the powers of the locally appointed liquidator. The appeal was dismissed, and...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment