WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd v Fikile Construction (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM024Apr17) [2018] ZACT 80; [2018] 1 CPLR 350 (CT) (22 March 2018)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, as the combined market shares post-merger were low and there were numerous competitors. The alliance structure, while creating economic links, was designed to promote transformation and development of historically disadvantaged contractors, in line with public interest objectives. The Tribunal imposed conditions to ensure equal treatment of Emerging Contractors and to prevent anti-competitive information sharing through the Fund, requiring annual reporting and safeguards on trustee appointments. The merger was approved subject to these conditions, as the public...
- Citation
- [2018] ZACT 80
- Parties
- Applicant: WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Fikile Construction (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Motheo Construction Group (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2018
- Case Number
- LM024Apr17
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
- Outcome
- Merger conditionally approved subject to specified public interest and competition safeguards.
- Judges
- Yasmin Carrim, AW Wessels, Medi Mokuena
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Public Interest Benefits, Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment, Market Power, Information Sharing Safeguards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Fikile Construction (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Motheo Construction Group (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the merger would result in public interest benefits, particularly for historically disadvantaged persons.
- 3 Whether the structure and operation of the alliance and the Fund could facilitate anti-competitive information sharing.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, as the combined market shares post-merger were low and there were numerous competitors. The alliance structure, while creating economic links, was designed to promote transformation and development of historically disadvantaged contractors, in line with public interest objectives. The Tribunal imposed conditions to ensure equal treatment of Emerging Contractors and to prevent anti-competitive information sharing through the Fund, requiring annual reporting and safeguards on trustee appointments. The merger was approved subject to these conditions, as the public...
Court Disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to specified public interest and competition safeguards.
Orders
- The merger is approved subject to conditions set out in Annexure A.
- The Emerging Contractors must be treated equally in the allocation of work within the alliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment