Werlex Properties (Pty) Ltd v Marketing and Graphic Media Company (Pty) Ltd (2010/30319) [2012] ZAGPJHC 31 (23 February 2012)
The court found that, based on the conduct of the parties, the content of their communications, and the surrounding circumstances, it was the intention of both parties that a binding lease agreement would only come into existence upon signature of a written contract and payment of the required deposit. The emails exchanged constituted negotiations and proposals, not a concluded agreement. The plaintiff failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that a partly written and partly oral agreement was entered into on 2 February 2009. Consequently, the claim for damages arising from breach of contract was dismissed. Regarding installation costs for dry-walling, the plaintiff failed to...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAGPJHC 31
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Werlex Properties (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: The Marketing and Graphic Media Company (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2012
- Case Number
- 2010/30319
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for damages arising from breach of contract is dismissed with costs. Defendant is absolved from the instance in respect of installation costs for dry-walling, with costs.
- Judges
- Tsoka
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Lease Agreement, Repudiation, Installation Costs, Absolution From Instance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Werlex Properties (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
The Marketing and Graphic Media Company (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a partly written and partly oral lease agreement was entered into between the parties on 2 February 2009.
- 2 Whether the defendant is liable for damages arising from alleged breach of contract.
- 3 Whether the defendant is liable for installation costs, specifically dry-walling.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, based on the conduct of the parties, the content of their communications, and the surrounding circumstances, it was the intention of both parties that a binding lease agreement would only come into existence upon signature of a written contract and payment of the required deposit. The emails exchanged constituted negotiations and proposals, not a concluded agreement. The plaintiff failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that a partly written and partly oral agreement was entered into on 2 February 2009. Consequently, the claim for damages arising from breach of contract was dismissed. Regarding installation costs for dry-walling, the plaintiff failed to...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for damages arising from breach of contract is dismissed with costs. Defendant is absolved from the instance in respect of installation costs for dry-walling, with costs.
Orders
- Plaintiff’s Claim A in the sum of R652 605 plus VAT is dismissed with costs.
- In respect of Claim B, the installation costs with regard to the dry-walling, the defendant is absolved from the instance with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment