Wessels v Die Meester van die Hooggeregshoof Bloemfontein en Andere (216/2006) [2007] ZASCA 17; [2007] SCA 17 (RSA) (23 March 2007)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the joint will executed by the testator and his spouse lapsed upon her death, as its operative provisions were conditional on the testator predeceasing her. The subsequent codicils, although validly executed, did not contain clear and unequivocal language evidencing the testator's intention to revive the lapsed joint will. Instead, the codicils reflected the testator's mistaken belief that the joint will remained valid, and merely purported to amend its terms. The Court affirmed that, in the absence of a clear revival intention expressed in a valid testamentary instrument, the lapsed will could not be revived. Incorporation by reference was also not...
- Citation
- [2007] ZASCA 17
- Parties
- Appellant: George Frederik Wessels NO; Respondent: Die Meester van die Hooggeregshof, Bloemfontein; Respondent: Frederik Johannes Theodorus Bezuidenhout (JNR); Respondent: Jacomina Johanna Grobler; Respondent: Jeremias Jacobus Andries Bezuidenhout; Respondent: Wilhelmina Cecilia Rautenbach; Respondent: Freddie Rautenbach; Respondent: Reinette Rautenbach; Respondent: Esmerelda Bezuidenhout; Respondent: Johanna Elizabeth Nel; Respondent: Patricia Bezuidenhout; Respondent: Frederik Bezuidenhout (JNR)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2007
- Case Number
- 216/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Bloemfontein High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, payable from the estate of the late F J T Bezuidenhout.
- Judges
- Brand, Van Heerden, Combrinck
- Legal Topics
- Joint Wills, Revocation of Wills, Testamentary Intent, Codicil Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Frederik Wessels NO
Appellant
Die Meester van die Hooggeregshof, Bloemfontein
Respondent
Frederik Johannes Theodorus Bezuidenhout (JNR)
Respondent
Jacomina Johanna Grobler
Respondent
Jeremias Jacobus Andries Bezuidenhout
Respondent
Wilhelmina Cecilia Rautenbach
Respondent
Freddie Rautenbach
Respondent
Reinette Rautenbach
Respondent
Esmerelda Bezuidenhout
Respondent
Johanna Elizabeth Nel
Respondent
Patricia Bezuidenhout
Respondent
Frederik Bezuidenhout (JNR)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Bloemfontein High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the joint will executed by the testator and his predeceased spouse lapse upon her death?
- 2 Was it legally possible for the testator to revive the lapsed joint will by means of subsequent codicils?
- 3 Did the testator's codicils demonstrate a clear intention to revive the lapsed joint will?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the joint will executed by the testator and his spouse lapsed upon her death, as its operative provisions were conditional on the testator predeceasing her. The subsequent codicils, although validly executed, did not contain clear and unequivocal language evidencing the testator's intention to revive the lapsed joint will. Instead, the codicils reflected the testator's mistaken belief that the joint will remained valid, and merely purported to amend its terms. The Court affirmed that, in the absence of a clear revival intention expressed in a valid testamentary instrument, the lapsed will could not be revived. Incorporation by reference was also not...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, payable from the estate of the late F J T Bezuidenhout.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Such costs are to be paid out of the estate of the late F J T Bezuidenhout.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment