White v Alstom S&E Africa (Pty) Ltd (JR1585/15) [2017] ZALCJHB 285 (7 August 2017)

White v Alstom S&E Africa (Pty) Ltd (JR1585/15) [2017] ZALCJHB 285 (7 August 2017)

The court found that the delay in filing the statement of claim, although lengthy, was not inordinate and was adequately explained by the applicant's medical incapacity and the negligence of his legal representative. The court accepted the medical certificate and the explanation provided by the candidate attorney. The prospects of success in the main claim could not be dismissed outright, as the fairness of the selection criteria and the automatic termination of the contract required further evidence and argument. The court concluded that condonation should be granted, allowing the matter to proceed to trial, and declined to make any order as to costs.

Citation
[2017] ZALCJHB 285
Parties
Applicant: George Andries White; Respondent: Alstom S&E Africa (Pty) Ltd
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
7 August 2017
Case Number
JR1585/15
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Statement of Claim
Outcome
Condonation granted for the late filing of the statement of claim.
Judges
van Niekerk
Legal Topics
Condonation, Late Filing, Fixed Term Contract, Automatic Unfair Dismissal, Retirement Age, Selection Criteria
Labour Law Condonation Late Filing Fixed Term Contract Automatic Unfair Dismissal Retirement Age Selection Criteria

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Andries White

Applicant

Alstom S&E Africa (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Condonation Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Statement of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's late filing of the statement of claim should be condoned.
  2. 2 Whether the explanation for the delay is reasonable and sufficient.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has prospects of success in the main claim regarding alleged automatic unfair dismissal based on age.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the statement of claim, although lengthy, was not inordinate and was adequately explained by the applicant's medical incapacity and the negligence of his legal representative. The court accepted the medical certificate and the explanation provided by the candidate attorney. The prospects of success in the main claim could not be dismissed outright, as the fairness of the selection criteria and the automatic termination of the contract required further evidence and argument. The court concluded that condonation should be granted, allowing the matter to proceed to trial, and declined to make any order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Condonation granted for the late filing of the statement of claim.

Orders

  • The late filing of the applicant's statement of claim is condoned.
  • The parties are ordered to convene a pre-trial conference and to file a pre-trial minute within 21 days of the date of this order.