Wiggett v Tshezi Community Trust and Another (2353/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 53 (3 July 2018)

Wiggett v Tshezi Community Trust and Another (2353/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 53 (3 July 2018)

The applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to possession of the hotel under the second lease agreement, as the trust lacked authority to lease the property and the applicant was aware of the true ownership before entering into the agreement. The evidence did not support the applicant's contention that the second respondent was involved in the conclusion of the lease. Furthermore, the applicant did not demonstrate that the balance of convenience favoured the granting of interim relief, having vacated the premises long before the application. The existence of a damages claim against the second respondent constituted a satisfactory alternative remedy. Accordingly, the requirements...

Citation
[2018] ZAECGHC 53
Parties
Applicant: Alexander Martin Wiggett; Respondent: Tshezi Community Trust; Respondent: Eastern Cape Development Corporation
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
3 July 2018
Case Number
2353/2017
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Action for Damages
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
G H Bloem
Legal Topics
Interim Interdict, Lease Agreement Validity, Prima Facie Right, Balance of Convenience
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interim Interdict Lease Agreement Validity Prima Facie Right Balance of Convenience

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Martin Wiggett

Applicant

Tshezi Community Trust

Respondent

Eastern Cape Development Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Action for Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie right to free and undisturbed possession of the Coffee Bay Hotel under the second lease agreement.
  2. 2 Whether the second lease agreement between the applicant and the trust is valid given the trust's lack of ownership or authority.
  3. 3 Whether the requirements for an interim interdict have been satisfied, including irreparable harm, balance of convenience, and absence of alternative remedy.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to possession of the hotel under the second lease agreement, as the trust lacked authority to lease the property and the applicant was aware of the true ownership before entering into the agreement. The evidence did not support the applicant's contention that the second respondent was involved in the conclusion of the lease. Furthermore, the applicant did not demonstrate that the balance of convenience favoured the granting of interim relief, having vacated the premises long before the application. The existence of a damages claim against the second respondent constituted a satisfactory alternative remedy. Accordingly, the requirements...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs, such costs to include the employment of two counsel.