Wilge Hervormde Gemeente and Others v Nederduitsch Hervormde Kerk Van Afrika and Another (5167/2016) [2021] ZAGPPHC 329 (13 May 2021)
The court found that the Litigation Committee did not act beyond its mandate. The Commission of the NHKA took the decision to litigate and was authorised by the General Church Meeting to do so. The Litigation Committee was tasked with the day-to-day management of litigation, not with discretionary decision-making. The Commission and GCM were kept informed and ratified all actions taken. The rule 7 application disputing the attorney's authority was dismissed as fatally late and prejudicial, given the history and costs incurred. The NHKA had the necessary locus standi to litigate, and its attorney was properly authorised. The application and point in limine were dismissed with costs, and...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPPHC 329
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Die Wilge Hervormde Gemeente; Plaintiff: Die Wilge Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Grootvlei; Plaintiff: Die Gemeenskap van Gelowiges Grootvlei; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Koster; Plaintiff: Die Diamant Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Meyerspark; Plaintiff: Meyerspark Christelike Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Noordelike Pietersburg; Plaintiff: Ysterberg Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Schweizer-Reneke; Plaintiff: Hervormde Kerk Vereniging Schweizer-Reneke; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Premiermyn; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Pretoria Tuine; Plaintiff: Saamstaan Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Theresapark; Plaintiff: Theresapark Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Rustenburg; Plaintiff: Rustenburg Christelike Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Vrede; Plaintiff: NH Vrede Eiendomsvereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Dendron/Vivo; Plaintiff: De Loskop/Blouberg Vereniging; Plaintiff: Hervormde Gemeente Oostelike Pietersburg; Plaintiff: Moregloed Hulpvereniging; Defendant: Nederduitsch Hervormde Kerk Van Afrika; Defendant: Die Registrateur van Aktes, Pretoria
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2021
- Case Number
- 5167/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application and Point in Limine Regarding Authority to Litigate
- Outcome
- Application and point in limine dismissed with costs. NHKA ordered to pay wasted costs from trial postponement.
- Judges
- N Janse Van Nieuwenhuizen
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Authority of Attorney, Church Constitution, Delegation of Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Die Wilge Hervormde Gemeente
Plaintiff
Die Wilge Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Grootvlei
Plaintiff
Die Gemeenskap van Gelowiges Grootvlei
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Koster
Plaintiff
Die Diamant Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Meyerspark
Plaintiff
Meyerspark Christelike Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Noordelike Pietersburg
Plaintiff
Ysterberg Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Schweizer-Reneke
Plaintiff
Hervormde Kerk Vereniging Schweizer-Reneke
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Premiermyn
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Pretoria Tuine
Plaintiff
Saamstaan Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Theresapark
Plaintiff
Theresapark Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Rustenburg
Plaintiff
Rustenburg Christelike Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Vrede
Plaintiff
NH Vrede Eiendomsvereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Dendron/Vivo
Plaintiff
De Loskop/Blouberg Vereniging
Plaintiff
Hervormde Gemeente Oostelike Pietersburg
Plaintiff
Moregloed Hulpvereniging
Plaintiff
Nederduitsch Hervormde Kerk Van Afrika
Defendant
Die Registrateur van Aktes, Pretoria
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application and Point in Limine Regarding Authority to Litigate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Litigation Committee of the NHKA was authorised to instruct attorneys to defend the action and institute a counterclaim.
- 2 Whether the rule 7 application disputing the authority of the NHKA's attorney was fatally late.
- 3 Whether the Commission of the NHKA could delegate its powers to a sub-committee for litigation purposes.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Litigation Committee did not act beyond its mandate. The Commission of the NHKA took the decision to litigate and was authorised by the General Church Meeting to do so. The Litigation Committee was tasked with the day-to-day management of litigation, not with discretionary decision-making. The Commission and GCM were kept informed and ratified all actions taken. The rule 7 application disputing the attorney's authority was dismissed as fatally late and prejudicial, given the history and costs incurred. The NHKA had the necessary locus standi to litigate, and its attorney was properly authorised. The application and point in limine were dismissed with costs, and...
Court Disposition
Application and point in limine dismissed with costs. NHKA ordered to pay wasted costs from trial postponement.
Orders
- The application and point in limine are dismissed with costs.
- The first defendant is ordered to pay the wasted costs occasioned by the postponement of the trial in October 2020.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment