Williams v Beyerskloof Wine Bar (Pty) Ltd (16561/20) [2025] ZAWCHC 240 (29 May 2025)

Williams v Beyerskloof Wine Bar (Pty) Ltd (16561/20) [2025] ZAWCHC 240 (29 May 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff had established all elements of delict. The defendant was in control of food preparation and failed to provide a plausible explanation for the presence of the needle-like foreign object in the food. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was applicable, allowing the inference of negligence from the circumstances, as such an incident would not ordinarily occur without negligence. The defendant's failure to take positive action to prevent harm was wrongful, and its conduct was both the factual and legal cause of the plaintiff's injury. The defendant was therefore liable for damages arising from the incident.

Citation
[2025] ZAWCHC 240
Parties
Plaintiff: Maxine Williams; Defendant: Beyerskloof Wine Bar (Pty) Ltd
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 May 2025
Case Number
16561/20
Procedural Posture
Delictual Claim / Merits Only
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim on merits succeeds; defendant is liable for damages to be proven.
Judges
Mantame
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Duty of Care, Negligence, Causation, Restaurant Liability
Delict Civil Procedure Personal Injury Res Ipsa Loquitur Duty of Care Negligence Causation Restaurant Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maxine Williams

Plaintiff

Beyerskloof Wine Bar (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Delictual Claim / Merits Only

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant owed and breached a duty of care to the plaintiff by serving food containing a hazardous foreign object.
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies to infer negligence in the absence of direct evidence.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's conduct was wrongful and causally linked to the plaintiff's harm.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established all elements of delict. The defendant was in control of food preparation and failed to provide a plausible explanation for the presence of the needle-like foreign object in the food. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was applicable, allowing the inference of negligence from the circumstances, as such an incident would not ordinarily occur without negligence. The defendant's failure to take positive action to prevent harm was wrongful, and its conduct was both the factual and legal cause of the plaintiff's injury. The defendant was therefore liable for damages arising from the incident.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim on merits succeeds; defendant is liable for damages to be proven.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's claim on merits succeeds.
  • The defendant is liable for such damages as the plaintiff may prove in due course arising from the needle-like foreign object contained in the food served to the plaintiff.