Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Ltd and Let Construction (Pty) Ltd (54/LM/May07) [2007] ZACT 50 (20 July 2007)
The Tribunal found that the combined market share of WBHO and LET post-merger would be 4.7%, with several large competitors remaining in the market. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the civil engineering sector. No public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the merger was approved.
- Citation
- [2007] ZACT 50
- Parties
- Applicant: Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Ltd; Respondent: Let Construction (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2007
- Case Number
- 54/LM/May07
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Merger Approval
- Outcome
- Merger approved without conditions.
- Judges
- D Lewis, Y Carrim, M Mokuena
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest, Civil Engineering Sector
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Ltd
Applicant
Let Construction (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Merger Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between WBHO and LET will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the civil engineering market in South Africa.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the combined market share of WBHO and LET post-merger would be 4.7%, with several large competitors remaining in the market. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the civil engineering sector. No public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the merger was approved.
Court Disposition
Merger approved without conditions.
Orders
- The merger between Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Ltd and Let Construction (Pty) Ltd is approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment