WNS Global Services (Pty) Ltd v CCMA and Others (D641/17) [2018] ZALCD 15 (21 August 2018)
The Labour Court found that the CCMA commissioner failed to consider material oral evidence regarding the notification of the relocation date. The evidence demonstrated that the union, acting on behalf of the employees, was notified of the move at least one month in advance, and that oral notification was sufficient under the policy. The commissioner limited her enquiry to the existence of a written agreement and ignored the oral evidence from the unrecorded portion of the meeting. The Court held that the finding of non-compliance with the notice requirement was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence. Furthermore, the Court found no procedural irregularities in the disciplinary...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCD 15
- Parties
- Applicant: WNS Global Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: CCMA; Respondent: Mlaba N N.O.; Respondent: Govender K and 21 Others; Respondent: K Allen
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2018
- Case Number
- D641/17
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Arbitration award reviewed and set aside; matter remitted to CCMA for determination of appropriate sanction.
- Judges
- F Coetzee
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Procedure, Collective Bargaining, Constructive Notice, Review of Arbitration Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WNS Global Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
CCMA
Respondent
Mlaba N N.O.
Respondent
Govender K and 21 Others
Respondent
K Allen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CCMA commissioner disregarded material oral evidence regarding notification of relocation date.
- 2 Whether the employer complied with the policy requiring 30 days' notice of relocation to employees.
- 3 Whether notice to the union constitutes notice to individual employees under the relocation policy.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court found that the CCMA commissioner failed to consider material oral evidence regarding the notification of the relocation date. The evidence demonstrated that the union, acting on behalf of the employees, was notified of the move at least one month in advance, and that oral notification was sufficient under the policy. The commissioner limited her enquiry to the existence of a written agreement and ignored the oral evidence from the unrecorded portion of the meeting. The Court held that the finding of non-compliance with the notice requirement was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence. Furthermore, the Court found no procedural irregularities in the disciplinary...
Court Disposition
Arbitration award reviewed and set aside; matter remitted to CCMA for determination of appropriate sanction.
Orders
- The arbitration award of 12 April 2017 is reviewed and set aside.
- The individual respondents were guilty of the misconduct charged, and the employer followed a fair procedure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment