Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd v Manqele and Others (JA 50/03) [2005] ZALAC 1; (2005) 26 ILJ 749 (LAC); [2005] 6 BLLR 523 (LAC) (23 March 2005)
The Labour Appeal Court held that a contract of employment was validly concluded between Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd and Manqele when the written offer was accepted, and that the subsequent termination prior to commencement constituted a dismissal under the Labour Relations Act. The Court found that the statutory definition of 'employee' in section 213 of the LRA, when interpreted in light of constitutional values and the purpose of the Act, includes persons who have concluded contracts of employment even if they have not yet commenced work. The Court rejected a narrow, literal interpretation that would exclude such persons from protection, noting that this would lead to manifest absurdity,...
- Citation
- [2005] ZALAC 1
- Parties
- Appellant: Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: T Manqele; Respondent: R Moletsane NO; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Security Retail Transport & Allied Workers Union of South Africa
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2005
- Case Number
- JA 50/03
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- NKABINDE AJA, NICHOLSON JA, PILLAY AJA
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Employee, Unfair Dismissal, Contract of Employment, Statutory Interpretation, Constitutional Right to Fair Labour Practice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
T Manqele
Respondent
R Moletsane NO
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Security Retail Transport & Allied Workers Union of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contract of employment was concluded between the appellant and Manqele prior to the commencement date.
- 2 Whether Manqele qualifies as an 'employee' under section 213 of the Labour Relations Act when his contract was terminated before he commenced work.
- 3 Whether the Labour Relations Act and its protections apply to a person whose contract of employment is terminated before commencement of duties.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that a contract of employment was validly concluded between Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd and Manqele when the written offer was accepted, and that the subsequent termination prior to commencement constituted a dismissal under the Labour Relations Act. The Court found that the statutory definition of 'employee' in section 213 of the LRA, when interpreted in light of constitutional values and the purpose of the Act, includes persons who have concluded contracts of employment even if they have not yet commenced work. The Court rejected a narrow, literal interpretation that would exclude such persons from protection, noting that this would lead to manifest absurdity,...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Manqele is entitled to approach the CCMA for relief under the Labour Relations Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment