Xaba v Revlon (Pty) Ltd (JR1291/2006) [2008] ZALC 185 (19 March 2008)

Xaba v Revlon (Pty) Ltd (JR1291/2006) [2008] ZALC 185 (19 March 2008)

The court found that the application for leave to appeal was filed 56 days late, far outside the prescribed 15-day period. The only reason advanced for the delay was the alleged negligence of the applicant's attorney, but no confirmatory affidavit was provided to substantiate this claim. The court held that the reason was not plausible and did not constitute good cause for condonation. On the merits, the court found that the grounds of appeal revolved around the interpretation of the employer's rule on money lending and its application to conduct outside working hours. The court reaffirmed its earlier finding that the applicant's conduct, including involving supervisors and human...

Citation
[2008] ZALC 185
Parties
Applicant: Elizabeth Xaba; Respondent: Revlon (Pty) Limited
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 March 2008
Case Number
JR1291/2006
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Condonation and Leave to Appeal After Final Judgment
Outcome
Application for condonation and leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Cele
Legal Topics
Condonation, Leave to Appeal, Disciplinary Code, Misconduct, Prospects of Success
Labour Law Civil Procedure Condonation Leave to Appeal Disciplinary Code Misconduct Prospects of Success

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Xaba

Applicant

Revlon (Pty) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Condonation and Leave to Appeal After Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was lodged within the prescribed time period.
  2. 2 Whether condonation for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal should be granted.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has shown prospects of success on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to appeal was filed 56 days late, far outside the prescribed 15-day period. The only reason advanced for the delay was the alleged negligence of the applicant's attorney, but no confirmatory affidavit was provided to substantiate this claim. The court held that the reason was not plausible and did not constitute good cause for condonation. On the merits, the court found that the grounds of appeal revolved around the interpretation of the employer's rule on money lending and its application to conduct outside working hours. The court reaffirmed its earlier finding that the applicant's conduct, including involving supervisors and human...

Court Disposition

Application for condonation and leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for condonation of the late filing of the application for leave to appeal is refused.
  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.