Xinishe v Lonplats Marikana Community Development Trust and Another (Leave to Appeal) (M658/2020) [2024] ZANWHC 5 (5 January 2024)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The trust deed specified a domicilium address in Gauteng and required disputes to be resolved by arbitration, depriving the North West High Court of jurisdiction. The applicant did not identify any clause in the trust deed indemnifying him from costs. The factual background showed the trust had become dormant and lacked funds, and the once-off payment was made by Lonplats Mining prior to its sale. The court held that the parties were bound by the terms of the trust deed and that the application for leave to appeal was a desperate attempt without merit. The statutory and case law threshold...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANWHC 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Reuben Xinishe; Respondent: Lonplats Marikana Community Development Trust; Respondent: Sibanye Stillwater (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 January 2024
- Case Number
- M658/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Ex Tempore Judgment and Reasons Delivered; Heard on 27 July 2023, Judgment Delivered 5 January 2024.
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs awarded against the applicant.
- Judges
- FMM Reid
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Jurisdiction, Arbitration Clause, Costs Order, Trust Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reuben Xinishe
Applicant
Lonplats Marikana Community Development Trust
Respondent
Sibanye Stillwater (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Ex Tempore Judgment and Reasons Delivered; Heard on 27 July 2023, Judgment Delivered 5 January 2024.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown reasonable prospects of success for leave to appeal.
- 2 Whether the North West High Court has jurisdiction over the matter given the trust deed's domicilium clause.
- 3 Whether the dispute should be referred to arbitration as per the trust deed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The trust deed specified a domicilium address in Gauteng and required disputes to be resolved by arbitration, depriving the North West High Court of jurisdiction. The applicant did not identify any clause in the trust deed indemnifying him from costs. The factual background showed the trust had become dormant and lacked funds, and the once-off payment was made by Lonplats Mining prior to its sale. The court held that the parties were bound by the terms of the trust deed and that the application for leave to appeal was a desperate attempt without merit. The statutory and case law threshold...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs awarded against the applicant.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal incurred by the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment