Yokwe and Another v Moitlhwe and Others (M389.2022) [2024] ZANWHC 260 (10 October 2024)
The court found that the resolution appointing the first applicant as a 50% member of the second respondent was unconditional and not limited to a representative capacity. The first respondent's denial of the appointment was contradicted by his own signed resolution and CK2 document. The argument that the appointment was conditional or intended only to secure a debt was rejected, as the resolution was adopted after the profit sharing agreement and did not reference any conditions. The first applicant, as a member, is entitled to participate in the affairs of the second respondent and to access its financial records. The requirements for an interdict were satisfied: the first applicant has...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANWHC 260
- Parties
- Applicant: Nelisa Yokwe; Applicant: Decades Investment (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: David Moitlhwe; Respondent: Dick 'N Roll Construction CC; Respondent: Department of Human Settlements, Northwest Province
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2024
- Case Number
- M389/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. Counter application dismissed. Costs awarded against the first respondent personally.
- Judges
- JT Djaje
- Legal Topics
- Close Corporations Act, Member Interest Dispute, Profit Sharing Agreement, Interdict, Joinder, Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nelisa Yokwe
Applicant
Decades Investment (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
David Moitlhwe
Respondent
Dick 'N Roll Construction CC
Respondent
Department of Human Settlements, Northwest Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first applicant is entitled to unconditional 50% member interest in the second respondent.
- 2 Whether the first respondent may run the affairs of the second respondent without proper member resolutions.
- 3 Whether the first applicant is entitled to access to the administration and financial records of the second respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the resolution appointing the first applicant as a 50% member of the second respondent was unconditional and not limited to a representative capacity. The first respondent's denial of the appointment was contradicted by his own signed resolution and CK2 document. The argument that the appointment was conditional or intended only to secure a debt was rejected, as the resolution was adopted after the profit sharing agreement and did not reference any conditions. The first applicant, as a member, is entitled to participate in the affairs of the second respondent and to access its financial records. The requirements for an interdict were satisfied: the first applicant has...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Counter application dismissed. Costs awarded against the first respondent personally.
Orders
- The first applicant is declared an unconditional fifty-percent member’s interest owner of the second respondent, Dick 'N Roll Construction CC.
- The first respondent, Mr David Moitlhwe, is interdicted and restrained from running the affairs of the second respondent without following due processes, primarily acting without a resolution by the meeting of the members of the second respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment