Zanbuild Constructions (Pty) Ltd v ABSA Bank Ltd and Others (2083/2009) [2009] ZAWCHC 225 (10 December 2009)
The court found that the delay in bringing the application for leave to appeal was excusable and condonation should be granted. The interpretation of the Absa guarantee, which formed the basis of the claim by the second and third respondents against the first respondent, is not straightforward and presents difficult questions of law. There is a reasonable prospect that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the interpretation of the guarantee. Given the importance of the matter and its relevance to similar guarantees in other cases, leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is warranted. The costs of the application will be determined by the appellate court,...
- Citation
- [2009] ZAWCHC 225
- Parties
- Applicant: Zanbuild Construction (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: Minister of Transport and Public Works, Provincial Government of the Western Cape; Respondent: Head of the Department of Transport and Public Works: Provincial Government of the Western Cape
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2009
- Case Number
- 2083/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 9 June 2009.
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal; condonation for late filing granted; costs reserved for determination by the appellate court.
- Judges
- Louw
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee Interpretation, Leave to Appeal, Condonation for Late Filing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zanbuild Construction (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
ABSA Bank Limited
Respondent
Minister of Transport and Public Works, Provincial Government of the Western Cape
Respondent
Head of the Department of Transport and Public Works: Provincial Government of the Western Cape
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 9 June 2009.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of the application for leave to appeal.
- 2 Whether there is a reasonable prospect that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the interpretation of the Absa guarantee.
- 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the delay in bringing the application for leave to appeal was excusable and condonation should be granted. The interpretation of the Absa guarantee, which formed the basis of the claim by the second and third respondents against the first respondent, is not straightforward and presents difficult questions of law. There is a reasonable prospect that another court may reach a different conclusion regarding the interpretation of the guarantee. Given the importance of the matter and its relevance to similar guarantees in other cases, leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is warranted. The costs of the application will be determined by the appellate court,...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal; condonation for late filing granted; costs reserved for determination by the appellate court.
Orders
- The delay in bringing the application is condoned.
- Leave to appeal is granted to the Supreme Court of Appeal against the judgment delivered and the orders made on 9 June 2009, on the grounds set out in the application for leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment