Zondi and Others v Somta Tools (Pty) Ltd (D770/10) [2014] ZALCD 31 (9 July 2014)
The court found that the applicants participated in an unprotected strike and were issued final written warnings without a disciplinary hearing. However, the respondent issued a clear ultimatum stating that employees should return to work on 1 September 2009, and the applicants complied with this instruction. The respondent's subsequent decision to discipline and dismiss the applicants, despite their compliance with the ultimatum and the agreement reached with the union, was inconsistent and amounted to reneging on its word. The court held that the dismissals were substantively unfair, as the applicants were entitled to rely on the respondent's ultimatum and agreement. The procedural...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALCD 31
- Parties
- Applicant: Alson Bonginkosi Zondi; Applicant: Mduduzi Ngubo; Applicant: Phindile Hlongwa; Applicant: Thulani Zuma; Applicant: Mfanelo Phillip; Applicant: Leslie Sboniso Ndawo; Applicant: Zwelibanzi Mncwabe; Applicant: Nondumiso Ngcobo; Applicant: Sandile Ndlovu; Applicant: Moses Ziqubu; Respondent: Somta Tools (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2014
- Case Number
- D770/10
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Dismissal Application / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- The applicants' dismissals were declared substantively unfair. The respondent was ordered to reinstate each applicant with retrospective effect and to pay outstanding salary emoluments in installments. No costs order was made.
- Judges
- Cele
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Unprotected Strike, Audi Alteram Partem, Disciplinary Procedure, Reinstatement, Retrospective Effect
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alson Bonginkosi Zondi
Applicant
Mduduzi Ngubo
Applicant
Phindile Hlongwa
Applicant
Thulani Zuma
Applicant
Mfanelo Phillip
Applicant
Leslie Sboniso Ndawo
Applicant
Zwelibanzi Mncwabe
Applicant
Nondumiso Ngcobo
Applicant
Sandile Ndlovu
Applicant
Moses Ziqubu
Applicant
Somta Tools (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Application / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' dismissals were substantively and procedurally unfair.
- 2 Whether the final written warnings issued to the applicants were valid and fairly issued.
- 3 Whether the respondent's disciplinary process complied with the requirements of fair procedure.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants participated in an unprotected strike and were issued final written warnings without a disciplinary hearing. However, the respondent issued a clear ultimatum stating that employees should return to work on 1 September 2009, and the applicants complied with this instruction. The respondent's subsequent decision to discipline and dismiss the applicants, despite their compliance with the ultimatum and the agreement reached with the union, was inconsistent and amounted to reneging on its word. The court held that the dismissals were substantively unfair, as the applicants were entitled to rely on the respondent's ultimatum and agreement. The procedural...
Court Disposition
The applicants' dismissals were declared substantively unfair. The respondent was ordered to reinstate each applicant with retrospective effect and to pay outstanding salary emoluments in installments. No costs order was made.
Orders
- The dismissal of each of the applicants was substantively unfair.
- The respondent is ordered to reinstate each applicant into the position each held on the date of dismissal, or a similar position, with retrospective effect from the date of dismissal, with no loss of earnings or benefits. The applicants are to report for duty on 16 July 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment