Z.T.P obo the Minor Child v Member of the Executive Council for Health Mpumalanga (43583/2015) [2022] ZAGPPHC 835 (17 October 2022)

Z.T.P obo the Minor Child v Member of the Executive Council for Health Mpumalanga (43583/2015) [2022] ZAGPPHC 835 (17 October 2022)

The court found that the previous order contained a patent error in the calculation of the total award amount. Rule 42(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court empowers the court to vary its own order to correct such errors. The correct quantification of damages was recalculated and apportioned among future medical expenses, loss of future earning potential, general damages, trust formation and administration costs, and past medical expenses, with the interim payment made by the defendant deducted. The court ordered the formation of a trust for the benefit of the minor child and directed the payment of the award and costs to the plaintiff's attorneys, with specific instructions regarding the...

Citation
[2022] ZAGPPHC 835
Parties
Plaintiff: Z.T.P obo the Minor Child; Defendant: Member of the Executive Council for Health Mpumalanga
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
17 October 2022
Case Number
43583/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Variation Order
Outcome
Order varied to correct the total award amount; judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for R19,797,605.29, with detailed instructions regarding payment, trust formation, and costs.
Judges
N P Mali
Legal Topics
Variation of Judgment, Medical Negligence, Quantification of Damages, Formation of Trust, Future Medical Expenses, Loss of Earning Potential

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Z.T.P obo the Minor Child

Plaintiff

Member of the Executive Council for Health Mpumalanga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Variation Order

  1. 1 Whether the previous order contained a patent error in the calculation of the total award amount.
  2. 2 Whether the court is empowered under Rule 42(1) to vary its previous order to correct the error.
  3. 3 How the damages should be correctly quantified and apportioned among the various heads of claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the previous order contained a patent error in the calculation of the total award amount. Rule 42(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court empowers the court to vary its own order to correct such errors. The correct quantification of damages was recalculated and apportioned among future medical expenses, loss of future earning potential, general damages, trust formation and administration costs, and past medical expenses, with the interim payment made by the defendant deducted. The court ordered the formation of a trust for the benefit of the minor child and directed the payment of the award and costs to the plaintiff's attorneys, with specific instructions regarding the...

Court Disposition

Order varied to correct the total award amount; judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for R19,797,605.29, with detailed instructions regarding payment, trust formation, and costs.

Orders

  • Judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff, in her capacity as mother and natural guardian of the minor child, for R19,797,605.29, apportioned as specified.
  • Interest to accrue on the sum awarded at 7.5% per annum, calculated from 30 days after the date of the order to date of payment.