Zulu and Others v Provincial Executive Committee - ANC, Kwazulu-Natal and Others (189/2022P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 63 (19 May 2023)
The court found that the respondents raised genuine disputes of fact regarding the alleged irregularities in the procedures leading up to the conference. The respondents' affidavits were corroborated by documentary evidence, including a final verification report, and addressed each complaint raised by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAKZPHC 63
- Parties
- Applicant: Mhlaliseni Ismael Zulu; Applicant: Bongani Patrick Ngubeni; Applicant: Siphiwe Mazibuko; Applicant: Siphamandla Mthobisi Gule; Applicant: Bongani Mandlingozi; Respondent: Provincial Executive Committee – ANC, Kwazulu-Natal; Respondent: African National Congress; Respondent: ANC Regional Executive Committee – Emalahleni
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2023
- Case Number
- 189/2022P
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Smart AJ
- Legal Topics
- Internal Party Democracy, Section 19 Rights, Conference Guidelines, Dispute Resolution, Locus Standi, Branch Verification
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mhlaliseni Ismael Zulu
Applicant
Bongani Patrick Ngubeni
Applicant
Siphiwe Mazibuko
Applicant
Siphamandla Mthobisi Gule
Applicant
Bongani Mandlingozi
Applicant
Provincial Executive Committee – ANC, Kwazulu-Natal
Respondent
African National Congress
Respondent
ANC Regional Executive Committee – Emalahleni
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the procedures leading up to the 11th Emalahleni Regional Elective Conference of the ANC complied with the ANC constitution and conference guidelines.
- 2 Whether the exclusion of certain branches and members constituted an infringement of section 19 constitutional rights.
- 3 Whether the applicants established sufficient irregularities to justify setting aside the conference.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents raised genuine disputes of fact regarding the alleged irregularities in the procedures leading up to the conference. The respondents' affidavits were corroborated by documentary evidence, including a final verification report, and addressed each complaint raised by the applicants. Applying the Plascon-Evans rule, the court accepted the respondents' version where disputes of fact existed. The applicants failed to establish that the conference was convened in breach of the ANC constitution or guidelines, or that their constitutional rights were infringed. Consequently, the application to set aside the conference and its decisions was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The applicants' claim is dismissed with costs, jointly and severally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment