Zulu v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA37/04) [2007] ZALAC 31 (11 December 2007)

Zulu v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA37/04) [2007] ZALAC 31 (11 December 2007)

The Labour Appeal Court found that the appellant failed to comply with the rules governing appeals, specifically by not filing the notice of appeal and the record within the prescribed time limits and by failing to apply for condonation for these delays. The Court was prepared to treat the appellant's notice of motion and supporting affidavit as a notice of appeal due to his lack of legal representation, but the documents were filed almost a year late. The appellant did not provide any application for condonation or satisfactory explanation for the delay. The record of appeal was also filed late and was incomplete. In terms of the Labour Appeal Court rules, these failures meant the appeal...

Citation
[2007] ZALAC 31
Parties
Appellant: Lawrence Bekumizi Zulu; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: A.R.N.O Mudau; Respondent: ABSA Properties
Court
Labour Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
11 December 2007
Case Number
JA37/04
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application
Outcome
Appeal struck off the roll due to procedural non-compliance; no order as to costs.
Judges
Tlaletsi, Zondo, Hendricks
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Variation of Arbitration Award, Condonation, Appeal Procedure, Review of Ccma Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lawrence Bekumizi Zulu

Appellant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

A.R.N.O Mudau

Respondent

ABSA Properties

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was notified of and present at the variation hearing of the arbitration award.
  2. 2 Whether the variation award issued by the CCMA commissioner was reviewable due to alleged procedural irregularity.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant complied with the Labour Appeal Court rules regarding the prosecution of the appeal, including time limits and filing of the record.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Appeal Court found that the appellant failed to comply with the rules governing appeals, specifically by not filing the notice of appeal and the record within the prescribed time limits and by failing to apply for condonation for these delays. The Court was prepared to treat the appellant's notice of motion and supporting affidavit as a notice of appeal due to his lack of legal representation, but the documents were filed almost a year late. The appellant did not provide any application for condonation or satisfactory explanation for the delay. The record of appeal was also filed late and was incomplete. In terms of the Labour Appeal Court rules, these failures meant the appeal...

Court Disposition

Appeal struck off the roll due to procedural non-compliance; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck off the roll.
  • There is to be no order as to costs.