Zulu v Mathe and Others (2751/2021P 2752/2021P) [2022] ZAKZPHC 6 (2 February 2022)
The court found that the applicant queen's claim for a declaratory order regarding her civil marriage and proprietary rights was moot, as her rights are protected by law and no live dispute exists. The application to declare subsequent customary marriages invalid was not properly pleaded and was dismissed for procedural non-compliance. The challenge to the authenticity of the late Isilo's will raised material disputes of fact requiring trial, and the court suspended execution of the will pending final determination of its validity. The succession to the Zulu throne was found to have been conducted in accordance with customary law and statutory requirements, with Prince Misuzulu properly...
- Citation
- [2022] ZAKZPHC 6
- Parties
- Applicant: Queen Sibongile Winnifred Zulu; Respondent: Queen Buhle Mathe; Respondent: Queen Shiyiwe Manthfombi Dlamini; Respondent: Queen Thandekile Jane Ndlovu; Respondent: Queen Nompumelelo Mchinza; Respondent: Queen Zola Zelusiwe Mafu; Respondent: Princess Thembi Ndlovu; Respondent: Prince Mbonisi Zulu; Respondent: Prince Thulani Zulu; Respondent: Princess Lindi Zulu; Respondent: Prince Vulindlela Zulu; Respondent: Prince Mxolisi Zulu; Respondent: Prince Mathuba Zulu; Respondent: Queen Mavis Zungu; Respondent: Other persons who may be members of uMndeni Wesilo; Respondent: Members of the Royal Family listed in Annexure 'A'; Respondent: Sipho Jerome Ngwenya; Respondent: The Premier of KwaZulu-Natal; Respondent: The President of the Republic of South Africa; Respondent: The Master of the High Court; Respondent: Sanlam Trust (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Princess Ntandoyenkosi Zulu; Applicant: Princess Ntombizosuthu Zulu-Duma; Respondent: The Executor of the Estate Late: Her Majesty Queen MS Dlamini-Zulu; Respondent: Prince Misuzulu Kazwelithini Zulu; Respondent: Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi; Respondent: The House of Traditional and Khoi-San Leaders of KwaZulu-Natal Province; Respondent: Leaders, National; Applicant: Prince Mbonisi Bhekithemba Zulu
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2022
- Case Number
- 2751/2021P; 2752/2021P; 10879/2021P
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications for declaratory and interdictory relief dismissed with costs, except for suspension of execution of the will pending trial.
- Judges
- Madondo AJP
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Customary Law Succession, Will Authenticity, Marital Property Regime, Interdictory Relief, Traditional Leadership Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Queen Sibongile Winnifred Zulu
Applicant
Queen Buhle Mathe
Respondent
Queen Shiyiwe Manthfombi Dlamini
Respondent
Queen Thandekile Jane Ndlovu
Respondent
Queen Nompumelelo Mchinza
Respondent
Queen Zola Zelusiwe Mafu
Respondent
Princess Thembi Ndlovu
Respondent
Prince Mbonisi Zulu
Respondent
Prince Thulani Zulu
Respondent
Princess Lindi Zulu
Respondent
Prince Vulindlela Zulu
Respondent
Prince Mxolisi Zulu
Respondent
Prince Mathuba Zulu
Respondent
Queen Mavis Zungu
Respondent
Other persons who may be members of uMndeni Wesilo
Respondent
Members of the Royal Family listed in Annexure 'A'
Respondent
Sipho Jerome Ngwenya
Respondent
The Premier of KwaZulu-Natal
Respondent
The President of the Republic of South Africa
Respondent
The Master of the High Court
Respondent
Sanlam Trust (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Princess Ntandoyenkosi Zulu
Applicant
Princess Ntombizosuthu Zulu-Duma
Applicant
The Executor of the Estate Late: Her Majesty Queen MS Dlamini-Zulu
Respondent
Prince Misuzulu Kazwelithini Zulu
Respondent
Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Respondent
The House of Traditional and Khoi-San Leaders of KwaZulu-Natal Province
Respondent
Leaders, National
Respondent
Prince Mbonisi Bhekithemba Zulu
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant queen is entitled to a declaratory order regarding her civil marriage and proprietary rights.
- 2 Whether the subsequent customary marriages of the late Isilo are invalid under civil law.
- 3 Whether the will of the late Isilo is authentic and valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant queen's claim for a declaratory order regarding her civil marriage and proprietary rights was moot, as her rights are protected by law and no live dispute exists. The application to declare subsequent customary marriages invalid was not properly pleaded and was dismissed for procedural non-compliance. The challenge to the authenticity of the late Isilo's will raised material disputes of fact requiring trial, and the court suspended execution of the will pending final determination of its validity. The succession to the Zulu throne was found to have been conducted in accordance with customary law and statutory requirements, with Prince Misuzulu properly...
Court Disposition
Applications for declaratory and interdictory relief dismissed with costs, except for suspension of execution of the will pending trial.
Orders
- In case number 2751/2021P: Application dismissed with costs, including costs of senior counsel.
- In case number 2752/2021P: Execution of the last will and testament of King Goodwill Zwelithini Zulu suspended pending final determination of action; seventh respondent interdicted from performing functions under the will; applicants to institute action challenging authenticity and validity of the will within...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment