Zwane and Others v Alert Fencing Contractors CC (JA36/09) [2010] ZALAC 27; (2010) 31 ILJ 2378 (LAC) (28 May 2010)
The Labour Appeal Court held that the default judgment granted by the Labour Court was erroneously sought and granted because the respondent was not notified of the proceedings as required by rule 6(7). The registrar was not permitted to enrol the matter for default judgment without notice to the respondent, nor was the Labour Court entitled to entertain the default judgment in the respondent's absence. The respondent demonstrated good cause for its default, provided a bona fide defence, and gave a reasonable explanation for its absence. The rescission of the default judgment was therefore correct, and the appeal was dismissed. The pending issue regarding the order barring the respondent...
- Citation
- [2010] ZALAC 27
- Parties
- Appellant: Sabela Zwane; Appellant: Aaron Madonsela; Appellant: Petrus Madonsela; Appellant: Ezekial Nkosi; Appellant: William Mashaba; Appellant: David Matadi; Respondent: Alert Fencing Contractors CC
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2010
- Case Number
- JA36/09
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Rescission of Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- Waglay, Tlaletsi, Musi
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Judgment, Default Judgment, Good Cause, Pre Trial Procedure, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sabela Zwane
Appellant
Aaron Madonsela
Appellant
Petrus Madonsela
Appellant
Ezekial Nkosi
Appellant
William Mashaba
Appellant
David Matadi
Appellant
Alert Fencing Contractors CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Rescission of Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court correctly rescinded the default judgment granted in favour of the appellants.
- 2 Whether the respondent was properly notified of the default judgment proceedings as required by rule 6(7).
- 3 Whether the respondent showed good cause for its default and for rescission of judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that the default judgment granted by the Labour Court was erroneously sought and granted because the respondent was not notified of the proceedings as required by rule 6(7). The registrar was not permitted to enrol the matter for default judgment without notice to the respondent, nor was the Labour Court entitled to entertain the default judgment in the respondent's absence. The respondent demonstrated good cause for its default, provided a bona fide defence, and gave a reasonable explanation for its absence. The rescission of the default judgment was therefore correct, and the appeal was dismissed. The pending issue regarding the order barring the respondent...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment