Z.W.Z obo S.L.N v Road Accident Fund (10925/2017) [2023] ZAKZDHC 28 (26 May 2023)
The court accepted the joint recommendations of the industrial and educational psychologists that the minor would likely have achieved a qualification between a diploma and a degree, and that the average earnings between these two scenarios should be used for quantification. The actuarial calculations based on this average, with contingency deductions of 25% for pre-morbid and 35% for post-morbid earnings, were found to be fair and reasonable. The court rejected the defendant's actuary's criticism of the educational psychologists' assessment, finding that only the educational experts were qualified to opine on the minor's future educational prospects. The court ordered payment of...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAKZDHC 28
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Z.W.Z obo S.L.N; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2023
- Case Number
- 10925/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Conceded
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings is upheld; defendant ordered to pay R5,624,821 and provide an undertaking for future medical expenses.
- Judges
- Balton
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Loss of Earnings, Quantum of Damages, Contingency Deductions, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Z.W.Z obo S.L.N
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Conceded
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate method for calculating the minor child's loss of earnings resulting from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident.
- 2 Should the calculation be based on Corporate Survey Earnings (Koch 2022), Statistics South Africa earnings by level of education, or an average of both.
- 3 What contingencies should be applied to pre-morbid and post-morbid earnings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the joint recommendations of the industrial and educational psychologists that the minor would likely have achieved a qualification between a diploma and a degree, and that the average earnings between these two scenarios should be used for quantification. The actuarial calculations based on this average, with contingency deductions of 25% for pre-morbid and 35% for post-morbid earnings, were found to be fair and reasonable. The court rejected the defendant's actuary's criticism of the educational psychologists' assessment, finding that only the educational experts were qualified to opine on the minor's future educational prospects. The court ordered payment of...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings is upheld; defendant ordered to pay R5,624,821 and provide an undertaking for future medical expenses.
Orders
- The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings in the sum of R5,624,821.
- The defendant is directed to furnish an undertaking in terms of section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 for 100% of the costs of all future accommodation and medical treatment for the minor child arising from the injuries sustained in the motor vehicle collision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment