Oberem v Nyirenda (Appeal from the Labour Regulating Authority) [2023] SHSC 16 (11 November 2023)
The LRA had jurisdiction as the respondent worked in St Helena for the appellant; minimum wage legislation applied because work was not substantially undertaken outside St Helena; only basic salary and accommodation were included in remuneration calculation, excluding bonuses and allowances.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] SHSC 16
- Parties
- Appellant: Axel Oberem; Respondent: John Nyirenda
- Jurisdiction
- St Helena
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed, LRA decision upheld with minor adjustment
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Wage, Jurisdiction, Employment Contract, Remuneration Calculation, Employee Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Axel Oberem
Appellant
John Nyirenda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Regulating Authority had jurisdiction over the employment dispute
- 2 Whether the minimum wage legislation applied to the respondent's work in St Helena
- 3 Correct computation of remuneration for minimum wage purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The LRA had jurisdiction as the respondent worked in St Helena for the appellant; minimum wage legislation applied because work was not substantially undertaken outside St Helena; only basic salary and accommodation were included in remuneration calculation, excluding bonuses and allowances.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed, LRA decision upheld with minor adjustment
Orders
- Parties to agree adjustment for pension payments in minimum wage calculation
- Respondent awarded costs to be assessed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment