19850530 TZHC Mbeya
- Citation
- 19850530 TZHC Mbeya
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 30 May 1985
- Posture
- Criminal Session Case / Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 30 May 1985
- Posture
- Criminal Session Case / Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the accused did kill the deceased but was insane at the time of the offence, based on the evidence of abnormal behaviour and history of mental illness, and thus not guilty by reason of insanity.
Court disposition
Not guilty by reason of insanity
Orders
- The accused is absolutely discharged in accordance with section 168(2)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code
02
Material facts
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution Counsel: Mr. KapingaAdajimu s/o Ngmilege
Accused Counsel: Mr. Nwakilasa03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Session Case / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused committed murder
- 02
Whether the accused was insane at the time of the offence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The accused admitted to killing the deceased but pleaded insanity at the time of the offence.
- Respondent
- The prosecution presented evidence of the killing and the accused's actions before and after the incident.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 168 of the Criminal Procedure Code
A person is not criminally responsible for an act if, at the time of doing the act, he was insane so as not to know the nature and quality of the act or that it was wrong.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the accused did kill the deceased but was insane at the time of the offence, based on the evidence of abnormal behaviour and history of mental illness, and thus not guilty by reason of insanity.
Court disposition
Not guilty by reason of insanity
- The accused is absolutely discharged in accordance with section 168(2)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 30 May 1985
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 30 May 1985
1. 0 1 .. ... 4 Ili THE hIGH C0TJrT OF TMZANIA AY MB.YA . ............'ORIGI3AL JUILISDICTION (Mbeya ieistry) QiUMINAL SESSIO13 CASL 1-1:0.72 OR 1980 THE rPUBLIC Verus AIJAJ'&U NGMILEGE CIwGE Ilu.rder c/s 196 of t ic Pea] Code. J U D G i' ii T 00 Mmtp?T(A T The accused person Adajiiiu s/o J;a.ji1ege is cna.rged with the offence of murder c/s 196 of the Penal Coda in thitt on 17th day of October, 1978, he ic a11ec3. to ave u Lered ka1aroti l'Iwikalinga. The accused adritt.a o iale 1 i1L t.e cicceased but pleaded insanity at , the time he conui'Ibted the offence. Prosection called upon only two witnesoo to. :up.)ort the charge. and these were. : ajileo•e /o hrurcli (F:i.l). 4ho father of th accused and Jo1.amu s/a iini ( 2) t ie 11 ifatiier c± the accused n.th .mon the accused was 3tayii , .:(lurla .) t e acte of ~, t.i.. iciiont 1ccordin toJot5jru (Pi.2), he told th court that the accusad has a long history • of insanity datin: back fro:i 1)74 wL c wac scat to Itumba hospital for treatment where he stayed for twb months. Again in 1975 he became insane and was sent to Itusba hospital for treatment 3rid from Itumba hospital he was transferrod to .•.boya hos'oital and from fbeya hospital lie was sent to Isann institution odoma for iental treatment. He stayed in Dodoma for three months. On 17th Octcber, 1978, early in the oornin; he again became insane and he came to this conclusion
because of his abnormal behaviour for he took a bill hook wishing to kill P 42 1 s wife, he then went on killing Jotumu's Cow, a goat and three chickens and he went round cutting P1.2 1 s bamboo trees. He then threatened to kill P,2 with the said bill hook .but PW.2 rnana;od to away the bill hook from iuin.. The accused then escaped from the hands of FW.2 and went to the directior were tie. ieceased with other children wore gazi&; heads of cattle. After a while PW.2 got informed that the accused had killed the deceased by straggling him and dumped the dead bcd into a rivar -2- I -2 On receipt of this repor P1.1. and PI2 wont to the scene of the Crime and there they saw the accused being quito naked and he pointed the dead body to PW.1 and F.2. The accusód ws then arrested and taken to the hospital. During the proceedin's accused was transferred to Isanga Insti.- tut ion for observatidn of hs.mental condition by bhe time he commi- tted the offence. The iiiedical räport in roepect thereof is very scanty and it stated in part:- 'M th tio of committing, the offence he was aware of the nature and quality of the ac'i. he is fit to stand trial and follow the proceodins in court, iO insight into his inapprOpri- ate behaviour was given by the doctor who examined him, I therefore discard this report, - The two assessors are of a unanimous opinion that the accused was insane at the time
he committed the offence and I agree with them because the abnormal behaviour prior to and after th commission.of the offence as narrated by his grandfather (P4.2) .ad,PW.l) clearly mdi- cates that the ácciaed was insane. I thefore under section' 168 (1) C.T.C.make a special finding that the accused did kill the deceased,- however, I as satisfied that he was insane at the tirie, tccordin;ly, b reason of the said insanity he is not guilty of the murte o:i: h1angoti s/o Mwakalinga. In view of my observation of the accund crson in court on his mental state, I order that he be absolutely discharged in aceordance with section 168 (2)(b) of the Criminal Irocthu'c Code, - C.G.NTENGA, JuDGE Delivered in open court in the presence of Mr. Kapinga learned State Attorney and 'ir Nwakilasa .1earnd Counsel fo '&couscd, this 30th dayof May, 1985 C.G. MTENGA,
JUDGE Assessors are thanked and dioflarged, - C G NTINGA,
JUDGI 30/5/85.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.