19920416 TZHC Tabora
- Citation
- 19920416 TZHC Tabora
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 16 April 1992
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 16 April 1992
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The convictions for conspiracy and theft by servant were upheld for the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 8th appellants based on direct evidence of participation in the theft and loading of rice. The convictions for the 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th appellants were quashed due to lack of evidence of participation or assistance. Sentences of nine years were found excessive and unlawful; substituted with eight years imprisonment for the relevant counts.
Court disposition
Appeals of 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th appellants allowed; convictions quashed and sentences set aside. Appeals of 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 8th appellants dismissed except for reduction of sentence from nine to eight years imprisonment.
Orders
- Convictions of 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th appellants quashed and sentences set aside; they are to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Convictions of 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 8th appellants upheld; sentences reduced to eight years imprisonment on relevant counts, to run concurrently.
02
Material facts
Parties
Emmanuel s/o Dibuke
AppellantSalvators s/o Maldran
AppellantDoo s/o Dotto
AppellantAmdo s/o Jilaka
AppellantBenedicto s/o John
AppellantDotto s/o Macange
AppellantShadrack s/o Matolu
AppellantThe Republic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Value of Stolen Rice: KES 297,506
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the conviction for conspiracy to commit a felony was supported by evidence
- 02
Whether the convictions for theft by servant and stealing were supported by evidence
- 03
Whether the sentences imposed were lawful and appropriate
- 04
Whether the trial court properly considered the individual participation of each accused
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellants argued that the offence of conspiracy was not proved, the evidence was unreliable, and that their individual participation was not established. Some appellants denied being present or involved, others claimed to have acted innocently or under instructions, and one claimed to have been wrongfully convicted while acting as a guard.
- Respondent
- The respondent maintained that the evidence established the offences charged, that the appellants were properly identified and implicated, and that the convictions and sentences were justified based on the facts and law.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
DPP v. Shannon (1963) Cr. App. R. 166
A co-accused may be convicted if he himself commits a physical act which is an essential ingredient of the offence, or assists another accused to commit such an act with the necessary criminal intent.
- 02
R v. Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534
Presence at the scene of crime and intention alone are not enough for criminal liability; there must be participation or intentional encouragement or assistance.
- 03
Rex v. Kantilal Kantilal and Another (1949) 16 EACA 116
Conspiracy may be inferred from conduct and circumstances indicating a common design.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The convictions for conspiracy and theft by servant were upheld for the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 8th appellants based on direct evidence of participation in the theft and loading of rice. The convictions for the 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th appellants were quashed due to lack of evidence of participation or assistance. Sentences of nine years were found excessive and unlawful; substituted with eight years imprisonment for the relevant counts.
Obiter and limits
- It is unnecessary to charge conspiracy where the substantive offence is consummated unless special circumstances justify it.
- The trial court failed to consider the individual cases of each accused, leading to misdirection.
Court disposition
Appeals of 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th appellants allowed; convictions quashed and sentences set aside. Appeals of 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 8th appellants dismissed except for reduction of sentence from nine to eight years imprisonment.
- Convictions of 2nd, 5th, 6th, and 7th appellants quashed and sentences set aside; they are to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Convictions of 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 8th appellants upheld; sentences reduced to eight years imprisonment on relevant counts, to run concurrently.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 16 April 1992
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 16 April 1992
r;:i=::; IIIGII COtL.;.T OF T.J:TZ_:J,T1 -~IEJLL.WJ Jl!?.:[3DICTIOU (T=ibc ,. RogistriJ) (RC) CJ.Il1IlJ...w ."i.I'LliL HOo 70 OF 1991 ORIGDL'I.L C:J.IJ'.m:L.L C.'i.S,.J no., 108 OF 1991 OF T:EEJ DI3TRICT COURT OF SIIIl:Y.J.lTG.'i. D!STRICT .\.T SHilJY.:J:TG.'i. Vorsus TI.D rr:::rtJJ.3LIC o o o o. o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o " o o o o o o o o t, o o o ILJSJ:OlTD:·~1JT I JUDGIIII!NT CI11.:;J.(J.Cg i.~t Co~l!& Oonnpiro.ny to con1:1i t a folony o/ s 384 of tb.0 ::-·onnl node C,2p~ 16<> 2nc.l CO'unt& Stc.'.],linr; l;y Sorv.:::,nt c/s 270 nnc~ 265 of tLo I'ennl Code Gnp. 16., Tho lot of ,1ino accused. 1x::::csons 11nr.1oly, ( 1) :·_;nr.1211uol s/ 0 Di bukc, ( 2) SnlV2tors s/o Ifal-dr.'1 1 (3) · Doo s/o Dotto, (4) hmdo s/o Jilo,l:1~ (5) :iJoncdicto s/ o John, ( 7) Dotto s/ 6 M::i,c;0,n::P, ( 8) Sl1C1Clr.::ick s/ o Mnto.lu, cihar::soc1 os first 9 soconcl, thi:i.1'..l, fourth, fifth, sixth, sovcnthy, oi,~th nn:1 ri.incth nccusecl parsons,, wore nll joi;1tly cind sq_1K,rcly :f,?.cinfs tl:c 1st count;; - '~onspiretcy to COIY!:i:t n fclon3, c/ n 384 of tho I'c:r:.2.l Coclo 1 the 2ncl an:l t;.-:.i:rcl ac cusocl j_)O:i:sons nc:lcli tiono.1ly cnl jointly 1:-;oinc cl:..::i,rgcd with the offon.co · of stc:ilin.c 1Jy sc1--v:::.:1t c/ s 271 of t~:..o ran.al Uodo 1 whle tho 3rc1. 9 4tl1, 5t:1, 6th, 7t!1~ 8th :mc1. 9t;.:.. c.ccv.soc.l poo: so;.1s, too in wlclitj_o;_1 to the first Co"._n t. of cons:::,ir::icy~ f:icin,:; t:·:c 0 c~1ar,3c of Stoetlinc c/s 265 of t]w Iennl Code Cnp.
16. J.t tl1c end of tho DG.rntl1on, I :.1n suro laborious trici,l, nll tho .lccusocl pe:csons ox:co::;it tl~o 8th nccusocl person$w~~o wns c.cqui ttoc:., were con~~ros1,ccti voly, as c~:nre,ucl 1 and. on 1st CUL.mt sontoncod. to two yocrs ir.1prison;:1ori\-, nccusocls No. 1 and 21 sontonce::'.. to nino yc::i,1"'8 inp:ri.sonnont on court No. 2, nncl nccusocls three, four, fivo, six_., soven c.ncl nino, sontoncoc.l to nine ;y-oecrs inprisonnont too on 2nd co1,111t, sontc:;:1cos to rc:l'l conc'LD:rontl;y·., 2 .,...,. ~ Tl.::.o so-coi.1victcd D.CCLlSCd l)C::'SOnS:, ho.vu,-:; not been introc1ucod to foo.s4if .. ', ;l:. istr.i:i,s rb;y 1 :1:;:,c n I,Tiow:1 1 ::md nro noH 2.l)fJC.lipc vido IIi@1 Cou.t't Crini.l".~l -·•:.?IJC2l lTos-0 70, 71, '7'2 1 73, 74, 75 11 76J ancl 77 of 1991 in the oJXlor of ist:i 2nd 1 3rtl 9 4tl:, 5t]1, ( .1 9 7th; and 8tl1 a:_;1xJ1ln11ts ros:pocti voly, only hcnco,..to be so referred. to or so caJ.lod.o Tl10 np::_:>cllcnts in 0110 way or another: m:dously n..v1cl puttin(; ns o:i::-poctocl, clifforine:; on:p;1G.sis in their c.,To,..i.nc.7..s .::lf cooplc:.ints? IJnintnincd tL~,t, ( 1) t~:o offence of ccns:;:iir:::icy of wl1ioh all wo:ro conviotoc\, wo.s not provcc'.:, ( 2) t>.r..t the ovid0::100 of ?o\;, ·j wns unrolinlJlco Sovornlly anc:. in:li vi:lujll;f, t~:c 2nd appol1:JJ1t ( 5tl:. -'i.ccnsecl) ~ naintninocl t::.ot as ho wes in III£_\.i.1 r:3.~ID prooises
at tho Datorial tir.o, he could not ::avo corn::i tt,.:.cl +110 ohn:i?c;cc7.. d''fcnoo,, 'rl:.o 3:rtl appellant (4th nccusccl) c;oncra1ly doniod tcinc po,rty, ns t210 5th np1,oll~nt · ( 9t!:. .:iccusoc.) oxp:rossccl s!1oclc nncl surp:dso 1;~'-t· l10 w::is a1. :;:estocl, when on info1.,nntion ho had cone to a:c:rcst tho thiov-os, a1. ~;t:d.ns 0 0 :r:ation:1lly :::.nJ. lo 0ica::.ly9 l:ow a known thief, a thief c:i-uj.1t rod :.1C1.nclcd, cat1;:;1t flacrnnto J.olicto so to spoo.l:~ co-uJ.d. be :'..e.:-J:trustoJ nit::. stolon :proporty, :;:' ~ U,, 1 clicl c:ctG:illy cor-:::nncl t:io 5t~: ::11:1::,101 ~.mt to cucird tl::.c rice ancl lor:;__--y., T!:.e 6th a:ppollc;.1t - ( 6t!:. C1.c.cusocl) · su7Jni tto:l t!::.::i,t )~is onl3r sin, F.'.1S to bo tJ:.cn conh~c; f'ron 1x:i."crol duty a;_1cl elJeclicnce to To'lo ,, to cn,11 t'.lC 1st appello.nt :fro11 lT<>lYI.C. n.ftcr w'.1ic:: ::c 1-rc,s np1n~chendedo Tl1e 7th n:p:c,ell:111t~ (7th accusccl) doos not w2-nt to coun-0cne,;:-_cc ·'::J o.:i.Joc;,:::,t::<cJ t:.-.'t :~0 ::;m:_' was at: t::.:o scono of cri.1:10 1 u:. 81.tlnc fcrcefull3r, tl::::it ho uas ar:i'.'estecl next ~by and wronesftuly. 0 _ind -t:·. ·- /Jt:1 u:;;i:pcll,.,,nt -· 2:xl nccrnecl - as in t:-ic. cou:rt below ::mcl in t::is cou:rt, is clonyine; :,_)c.1.~ticipation in nny d.eg::.-c.. _;J in tl:o pcrpot:;:-:::.tion of t~1e criocs i'fan;y- :::.s t::.c a;_J;::icll'.>nts a:~·o_:i I
GD nssurinG ,t:1on, t>.nt t:.10_ ovid.onco -i:ou.cllinc; c.:::c:1 of t:-1.0;::: 9 nncl wl:ct~:cr such oviclonco est::i,tlisl:.cd t:.-~o offences cl~argccl, uill ~1croaftor rcoci vo tho nooossnry Ju:licicl nttc;.1tion, .\.. s I vcstnoss of t:.~o. evi·lc11cc;1 t::.c follouinc facts r;o -undis:._,utoclc, Tho S~1i1·1;;-c:2e,c: Lationc:l 2~ilL11-3' Cor}_)orc:,ticn, 1Jl1io~:. nm.10 is ~;oronftc:: to 1Jo alJbrovintoJ E .11 .. c. ·" w1:;.osc :-:,'o-downs nro si t·:.·.a.tcclly near, HIL..J:, SOUD: s oiJ1:.1ilP s yn:i'C:., :~s 111 one :.~Glo:v::n t 2~:c,:i, sL2'l'inc; t~10 fence wi t11 t:1c s::ij_cl r;_:;:~'J:., SOUD ~ Tl::.o n::i,icl oil ,:~ilJ.o .•wtunll;y- lJolonc -to Poi[., 5 }fOIL'.l'.CD 3.'.LlJlI wL•'.) tooi, t::on c:n:;;iloyocl t~:i.o 2n1 n::x:·,clln11t ( 5th accused) 7th, 6t:1 a;_Jpollant ( 7tb nc,msod) :::izd t:::.c Ct:1 :::cct;..r.,;:,.: :~..,.100 acq:t.,ti,tt0d. It coos ui thout c7-is:puto,', t~wt, lorry S(!_~HI-~ T'7,• ~ 775;?~ I-·~ t'..'..O i)-.L~O'.)v·,-,~ty, of ?oWe59 t::cn 1ccinc Cc:i.'J.V011 .,,~, TT,.""!. J. - - a • b,y -,t., iT... 8' -- ,- I 2/ 1c:" 1·r'.~"J on c.'); · £ j,YJ :n tor cc;:;j_n f1.~on Uzoc;oro~ :parkocl t~'.O so.icl vchiclo 0 L1 t:w ,_,_, <-<,~1· ,, --.,,.,,,,.7 ..'"'p t t,,.10 lQ:11 ,.,.,.,., ~i,.~ ·- .,,,..,,.,_) u-,,,~ . . . t1on . .Koy,I mntch, . a t 1. t s usu.:11 p1 nco, , 3 It is ::.olyinc c>Dl lonc;c, t~:at tho oarly Domine; of 26/2/1991,
was crcdi l:lo Tri t:..1oss to t'.1c, ~l:;.soovDi:i~, tl:'.<':i.t tb.o s:::ic1 SC_'J.~L~ TZo 775521 hnd "boon laboi'i.01.,1.sl;;r loG.docl with thirty fivo L':::,'S of :;;ico,, Fv.:.i;:::.0:r wi tncssin::s this lond 1 w2-s P.,U.2 DOGUS rL'..TilT.DJ KISlJ11T0 1 tho c..ssistr:c;.1t lT~I-'toCo i):i:.3-ncll lt::nac;c:;.', I;'. w. 3 'tITLTIJ::lT C1nd. lJy noloss 0 cro::l.i blo wi tncss t:::.nn -\Lo ownor of tho Vohiclo J?oUo5 NOlLJGD S_i.LlJm, opart fron ?o~-Jo1 B.,5625 Cple NJUL~, w~~-rno ovicloncc will bo visi tu.l soon, nt o:p:iorttmo tino.. Thus rolov::mtly :posin~ :_cro 9 is, t:cct it is coot on tho ovidonco!' to 1:12ko a finding of fact, t 1 ·,2t indeed. the Scnnio. TZo 77552, t~10 rie;21tful liJ:O}.)Crty of :r.11.,5, was on t~-.c r.:.o::."'l.1in.:s of 26/2/-1991 found lo:1clccl. wi tl'. thirty f'i vo b::.::,n of rice. !Jo riowo:r, not oven colostiol · power can, ovc:;:-ttJ.r.n t.is fj_:r.:.:-lil1.~ of facto Tr2:asconJ.:::mto.1 of nll, -:,t tlcis sta;-;o in r:iy view, is t~.10 issue/ question, whose :i..~ico wws tlliSu Tho ti1:1oly ~mcl opportunely assistance, fro□ l'o Wo 1 MOILi.l'·J=:;JJ S/,.LUM, is tl.::.at tLo rice tL.ough found in his vol:iclo was not b.is, anc1 l:ielie1,UlJly it was ·not 10.:1:Cod t:.:.o:rnin at t:::.c inst::inco, 2ntl ini tiati vo of tLo 8th accv.sc.1.., :c1or with the knowlo:1,.,-o of P.u,.5, nor of ?.Wo2 2n:l Pa1io3• J3ut t~::.o oviclcnco of r~"iio2,
t;~.'.:l-t t' 1.. :dco 1::.o.+ s:pillod all throuc_;'l.1 tho fonco to tho N.. li.:oCo go-:lown, tl1at it ~::.2,C. 1:;ecn loaded in SI:IT:iG.JCU labelled bngs 9 as su:;_;:c,ortcd by tho Citi.:lci1co of PaWo3 :md. :;:~:!,,4, t!10 s::-,Ll typo of l::1-:;s t:::.on only being used lJy H.n,Co cnn onl;:r loo.~: ono clofini to anl co:rtnin conclw:don} ::mcl t::c:t is, that t::c. 1"ico found lo::K1..o:1 in lori-'Y SC.:JJLl Tz.· 77552, oric;in:::,toc1.. froIJ l'JolioC• go-d.ovms oi~ p:rodscs 9 anc.1.. was tl::.o property of tho vor.y l'J.M.C-, as clid ?e ;To 2, and I'o~\o 3 tcstifyo Ullo took t:.o ri vo frct:1 NoIIoCo and loaJ.od t'..10 se,c:-:o into t~1at lorry, t.:::!:.:::s or :1ss1.,1.1-:i.:, n t1~;::msccndcntal Jincnsion ,:m~l significance at t2.1is stn_c~o. It is ,ri th rospcct to t:'iis question, t:.:c:t Ctll the appoll~nt I s powerful c:::.n-on fi:ro, no, ator.1ic c:::j_)l,)si vo? lms llcc:;_-1 c1..ircctcd cit :Z o ::. 1 :3., 5625 Oj_:,lo NJUJ'L.~. :.'.:ndccd, to nll intents a:1":-.. i,Ul'poscs, I.~r. 1 :S.,5625 Cpl. NJL1YU, is :i ocntrcl :-.m:1 o~~-icf :~ct'.):.' in this closine; c;:..npter, anc~ w\r l1c is tho contra of suc;:1 attack by tho apj)oll:::;_1ts s'..:.oc:J.c:l 1.:,o ur1:lorste,:cicl2;)10, in tLat very lir.}1t ,of ~s sigrlificci:1ce in t:::.is cnsoo For, &- Iclico ofi:icor, or such J.'olatccl officci, such attci.c:rn nrc occuJ2tio11al haz:-.:ixls~ anc1 OJQOOted oven
whon unjustifiabloo Tl::.us it is tho c:vi(Lo:.1co of ro 1Jo 1, t':.Gt ;:..c.s to undergo scrutiny cor.i::1cnsu.ratc with tl:.o attack c1..ircctcJ at it., E:01-i" l:.o cliscovorocl the c:rinincl incidontt boinc; p:i1"1,o- tr:1tocl, ~;.:nc:. ;::y whee is too sic;nificant np. issue, to. bo rolagatod to oblivion, · tb.at woulcl.. ;)o :':'_,ustr::itinc t:::.c convictions, thnt culoinatinc;ly .. it ..,. t:;.. ·!_; I-J.~t it cooo, f:20::: the ~1jJcocs r::outl'. - :;_·., ~T. 1 Cpl. NJUM.-~, s:::.ys t::.usg- 11 1 ~::.::tvo 1mown t~:.c 1st~ 6th, 7t!1 .'.:Ind 9t~: ::iccl~So:ls for long tinoc On 26/2/91 I w:cs at t!"J.o NoMeC .. ,'.1rorr on :;_D-trole • ' llC:CO ri:Jcoi ·r,rj_n,3' t\::, G:--:, ?C • I wont nc:J.r t,ooo 1-f.1·'.o wc1°0 ·0y t~:.c ve,'.}j clcc- T::o;y 11c:r:o tl:o 4th :::C:i.",,.d 5t:1 ;:;ccusocls. T~:osc c:J.rrying the l::c ..;s fl'O!J. NeEoC • .:,c0u.s0ds., ,.:~t>. :,,ccusc;l$ to knou ,r:--.:-:-,t t~:oy u.::.ro lo:J.dinc;o T::.oy s::-:i:'. :cicc, I SYiJ t:.;::i,t t]:c 'iJ-J.,~'S c;:,,;,1t~inod ricoo In t::.c vvl'..icloy tl:cro_ ':-Tero a lot o~-baga, and on the cround these were tuo bass~ T::o 6th :m·::. 7tJ: ::i 0 wettcllnon nt I:iilal 3C'Udo 0 Tl:.c vo:1-iclo U[cs ~ci'l t>:.:.. ~;:i:CJC . ,:;_- Scti/.o T::cy were prcse:i.1t :J.:,out ·10 pacco only f:cc:.~ t'tc voliicloo I intorro,S"o.to::J. tl1co .an:;. t::_.Jy s2id thnt, wl~_.:ct u2s '.":t1J1,-:;ninr; t~.e,~~ la::.;u.
Thoy said t!cc1t }'.; olio Ce 01:qloyccs were :;?L-rctiw; t>cir :cico in t:,is vehicle, nn.:l th.::it, t>.;:;y '.·.ad .::1s1'.:o~ to .::':---op t:.~oir rice t;::.cro till r.1ominr; 9 vf:.cn t'.e,3· would ccc:.; for it. T>0:7 '.:;,:::i,1.. ::tllow.::,i. t 1~•.,;~~,, to store this rice t::oro 11 • I to ..:,l{ t:10 7th DCCUSocl to t!.:o in-cl~J.l'[,O cf t~.'.C ::;oo::ls of FoHoCo T>.o 1st 2::.1:1. 2nc1. ::1ccusods C.'.}.iJC. I oskc.1. t:..c first C',CCL'!.D J~i. wJ:ot:~or ).0 l·.nous t~:c 2nd nn:1 L\t:--. nccusorl. Ho onir: >c !;::nous t:·.c::i, ~:.o s:•:id t: .ex wore; ElU1)1)0S,,,;Cl to be ,Jl1 cluty t::Oj.'lo I cn'..:::cr.l t:1::t 11 Tv.lin:lo r~~o'-:.1' • T .-:cskc:l le.in t::.J nw-.1;:(::;_' of ~;;:i,,~ t: .OJ-- ::cd lc':,.1.o,l.... Ifo cov.Ll net s.:1y11 o p::::-J·;:i:-:.ss j_r_ t: _.:.; c0,sc, s::ou.L'. iJc t_;:c considorettion 9 as to t1::c loesal cff< r;+ c::.::ir:-;Lc t,ro OX' :.:rJ:ro :lCGLls:.;:~ i~Cl"'Sons,with one or noro offences in D sinclo, count .:.:~ .,:1 ii1:'c:.cir.1cnt J .:::c 5-s t: e c::iso J:oroo First .:end forco-i:iost it is tri tv 1 :,i, t.' ..,t, ::i c: . 22:,;.:: ::i:::linot two or Doro' accu.soJ. ycrsons in '.J. si;,1,~;].o er Gc,c:. cnm-i:i, iG j:;ii1t ::.?::: scvc:cnl ::1t t>o S-?,no tir.10, 1:1ca11.ins t>.:tt, .::my accunc:~. Go joiDocl. in :i j,)int tri::1 1 ~.1.'Jy sovoraly be found gu.il t;w of tJc:.o of:i:.::.;nc;.;, if cm t'..;:; cvi.Jc;~cc_,
.·.c was ::::ctin,1·on .'-.is ow;:1 c;n::'.. not in 9 cc:.::co:.~i; ~-,it:. a,1;y ct: .er :::c., ct·,sc.:".. person jointly c:,:1rcoi. nit'..::. I•tir.ll'or bo joi:.,_tly c011vi8t:.:::.., if t:.~: Yffcnc.,:; is C'11JaLlc cf ii Jcii.1,~ co,Jr.1ittocl 1:y On.J o:;.' .::oro ~·:cCC,_SC'. j_;:~n:ic.1::i~ .:m~~ - : - GS t 8.:Jl l;Jf,'.,:;d c • I • the co-accused . 5 Thai is ;::. · cnn ;:13vertholeso 2lo~1c.. 00 .:;01r,"i.ctccl on t~:o s:o.id count severally See D½") Vs., l'~b;~nnt1H ( filV_3.§ Cr • .'.!.£Po 166 at pa.go 796 Loni :Ji_plock saying8- nr conclude 9 thercfo:.c;,:, t:.1at, whot::ior two o:c 001~0 defendants 2:re charged in tl:o same cot.mt of an indictc,Kmt ·ni t:.i any offcnco 1 which mon, canholp each.other to commit 7 it is sufficient to suppo:..st a conviction agciinst any .Poach of them, to prove either~ that ho himsolf did a physical act which . ho holpod o.nother defendant to do such an act, cmd. · t:1c1t in doi1;1g th0 act :i o:..~ helping tl10 other dofondnnt to do it~ ho hims .:,lf hnd tl:o necessary C rimina,l int e:1t" 11 . Thus:, as wo co,i t is clea:;.~ tl-:at a ·co-accu.sod r,;~y bo.9 oi t:1or convicted of t:"l.e charged crj_no 1 if l10 himself corn:ai ts a physical ·riot which in law is all' ossontinl i:;.1cs'l.~odiont of t'..10 offonco, or~ whore ho h2-s l:olpcd. &nether 2ccuo0d to commit s-rn'.1 act,. which is an essential incredient • of tile offonco~
and in doing t:10 2.ct~ -or ronclor:i.ng assist.::moo to the co-accuoocl, ho h0,d thu nccessa::..~r requisite mens rooo It follows in my view, tl::.o.t, the ovidonco c:tdd:1.,1.cccl in a. joint ti"':i.21 must bo so nnnliscJ. 1 sb.0°rir..:::; tl .c ;?ctunl n0,tu:ro of pc1:2ticipation of onch 0 co-nccuso(t, i.o,.,, oi thor th,3 :ph;y-sicnl act which is o..;1 cssontinl. inG:~oclicnt of tho offence charged, or, assistance by hil:il.9 to his co-accused. wit:.1 tho nocossai~ criminal intonty w:1icl1 would possibly . . ·oxpdsc !.1ir.1 · to conviction . clone, and in case: of t:1c latter position, as n joint ofp:mc!.er<!' Com~ng to tl:c cc:so in point encl at :::.c.nd, it docs socw 1 that tho ti"'ial Co1,~'t clwol t ·with the nppollc::nts omnibusly o..ncl so concluded, without donling vli th each nccusods caso.9 as associated: to, and or:,·covorod by tho ovidonce &clc7.:1.,.:ccd.e I vontuJ:c to say with ~:oc::iicx:ct; t~ic.t tllO s~-:ic1.. trl::-.1 Co_u:..~~ lo_st its JuiJ.ioial rudder ancl su:ffo:cod s11ipwrock on the i~ooks or::· :ci'::i'-:i..-..;~'.66~ iiio, ·ove~o:i.f;ltt..r hence his fc-ilu:r-c to consider each nccv.s::,d persons oasol' on its mci"'i ts., With rcs:;;,oot 1 I. ho..d hopoc1, I would. bo so.vod froIJ tt.e onerous burden of cloo-lin,:; 1-11.th tl:is ospoct 1 hut o,la.s I have to. StC1·1"'tinc; from tb'"' ,. with the 9th o.ocusocl I':::rnon, - t:10 5th appellant
SHAD.11CK s/o l'fJ.TJ.LU_, tho oxoor_pt 2-l)ovo f::r::om I'.o Wn 1 HJUH.::.. 9 r.mlrns no mention of him, not oven rcootol;y1 I dare sny. It W.'.lS in cross-0:;cJ.'.•.1inntion, by tho vor.f 5th a:ppollmit, t~:at 11 ,_w__ bl..££'.?_'_t_~_,_c_o-n_o_·... ~'_.,o_:.._,_l_o_-f_tt_ll_c_b_n..e;...· _o_fr 1.·_o_o_..,•...•-•-•-•--t.......o.....,gua...•...rd • 11 ___ T!10 5tJ.: appoll::.nt is a1" ex-policoc1,::m, who clc.ioecl in his d.ofcnco, th:1t ho wont t~1c:rc to a.rrost t::-:o tLie~o, 2s ho ).:a.cl info:cr::1nt:: e:;.1 about t}~c theft, then tnldn 0 place., .::..nd tll,:it ?o :"io 1,did trust and co;,1;;1c-T,::L l1im to guard tho said J."ico:., 1-1)1.ich ho 5tl1 :.ppo:::..:::nt dutifully clid, is Let in dis].)uto. . \ 6 ConfoGsoclly, t1.10 evidence against tho 5th appellant ( 9th accused), about his porportration of, 01· his a.ssistanco in tho perpetration of tho chargoa. offonce,whero nnc1 how, is just not on rocorcl, which we havo to go - by, anc1. it would be unj•:e.t and nbsoolutoly preposterous to suggest, t:1.a.t gua:ro.ing tho rice, wl1ich he clid as a ci tizon, dutiful to help r.w.1, OJ) to be in nocontly a.bout, anounted. to such chargoc1 offence. In my viow, not oven tho proverbial saying, that if you. w2.nt your p:ropo:t"ty safo ont1.-,,1.st it to t}10 thief, docs not apply hero, as tho appellant was not a proven thiof, in tho fi:rst place. Ho was wronGlY
convicted, his appeal is allowed, convictions. '-'luashoc1, and sontoncoS sot aside• Next, ai'O sixth ond seventh accused persons - 7th and 6th appellants Benedict s/ cf..J;;?:,~ 1ffi~nga, rospocti voly. ~-~cco:ro.ing to P. w.1, those woro watch.1ue11 at Sou::1.' s place, and that they wore at the oc..torial time a.bout ton pccos from, tho then 'boing loadod lorry TZ. 77552, on tho night of 25/2/1991. But according to the evidence ofr.u.5MO.UI.'U1ill:D s.·•.LtJM, it is 1IBIG.:\. s/o 11/L:\.CIIIY.1 ... tho 5th accusoc1 - 2nd appellant, and DOTTO H..W.J:TCL\. 7th acc1..1Sod - ancl 6th appcllo.nt who uoro ~1is watchnon at tho natorial tiTI10, while EJffDDIGT s/o JOHN tho 7th appellant/ 6th accused is indicated as TBJ3 watchrann. It would. follow f:ror:1 erodible r. W" 5, thoroforo~ that it was the 2nd and 6th apl)cllants, that P, n.1 sa.w about ten pacos, fror.i the lorr,- TZ~ 77552. Ilowl'.Y.1 could nistalro tho 7th appollant,(6th accusod),,-ihich . . mi~t havo l)oon,possiblOjiS to be dolt with horonftor, at opportunr tirJ.c. _\.cco:.."tling to r.w.1 1 tho 211d ii.ppollcnt nnd 6th appellant, upon being asked as to what was happening-, they clearly and apparently innocently told hin, that the N,u.,c. onl)loyecs, wore storini:~ thci:r rice li.nto the volu.olo, for oollootio11 in the rao1"ning• · .'i.nd that they had allowocl thom~ but hero, .. we arc vd,ti:.1out t!:o toms of tho lT
.11'.ioCo application for tl1at1 nor of tho appollant 1 s po1":i1ission, to tllon. There is no cvidonco s~:o~n.ng, thnt tb.cso ap].)ollants wcro load.in.:; tico, or otl:o:;..,wiso, cri.minci,lly encouraging tho SODc, a11:.1 yet the oxplonation has not been diso01,,ntod at allo In r:cy view, tho circu--:istanccs in rcs:;_:)oCt of tl:o 2nd ond 6th c,:;_:)l)Ollnnts doro£,uto, f:con crininal lii:11Jility in tho filattor, - first, if the above roc1uost wa.s r:i.c,c.lo by the w,M.c. cr:1ploycos, tho grunting of such request l)y t:10 a11pollants, hns no Criuino.l taint1 or oon..11otation, for tho lon--y i;.1to which ·tho loadi:n0 wns noo.o, was ir:mobilo, nnd just there in the absence of tho ch--:L vort who hncl no i6').i tion koy o,ny wcy, tl10 switch well kopt nwn.y1 ancl tl~c clri var no whore ncsr. Tho fonr tl:.at tho rice covJ.c1.. otl1orwisc illcc,;ally clisappear, could not oasily emerge in their r.rl.ncls, and t:1.0roforo · t:.10 c:rirainal intent, is not oven nanifost. l .... 7 Socrnncl~ :i.t 1'.rotu.j ::i,ppca.r1- thpt t . .:..o dppull:r,t:; w:..:cc ton ]_)nccz o.woy, i;:1 ',vc ~ ·;· 1;7 in t:-,; :li:i;'ct, ;<on of loac~in1; tho lorr;r• It Day now be asked w·:10t>.or, inncti v .ty ct. the ·sc~'.:10 of crinosj is su.ffic"iont for Cr:lPin:--1 li::,U:u.tyo :::n rJ.y ,.rfow 9 ·i:'.Q issLo doos i1ot Gttr:i.ct o positive ans_wo:;:•, fo:r t:.::.o L,w cl.)0s not (lcmction m9ro pros
ens ch or oven i::or.::; a.nu inte,n·cion, ui thout +ho concm~ronce of intontion,:-.[;actiqn but .o~~ort acts 1 ns c;.":l.cin21isoc: 9 '.111-:1. r.10.;.u.fostocl,, so,.1otinos followinc SLlCl1 ..r<::l0vant intention or .. tl~G :::1i:·.n.,_squo~ .\.s it wcG ~1olc1 in t}10 08,SO of B-~vs~--1~~J:SS0,~T_ U271} I1!!~~Il• _149g2,. pro::.:cnco or ancl intontion 1 is not enough, tho accLlSGcl rmst' oitl:0r ~c!~S}~!!P~~:•;0~o~_l1i~ ...P.1::'.£.~,i.9iJ2ntio!1_, or there gust bo£!1 in_t_QD1:l:.?.!L~2....2.1-:~C2.£~'C[~~ or1j _t;:9.E.C: JIL'.8t 21~.£..;..~.,. onoUJ:[\;0~2£!:l t iri fo.s!J. , :ln~t::.o_2~~-~-C?~ of ~ •2.rll.:E:!. On t::c ovide:160 in· this co.so; tl:.oro is not1:inG to su;'(S'OSt t':~J-t., oi t:10r 11p11cl10,11ts :wt11:i.lly on thoir own pnrticipatoc1, nor cri:Jin'.J.:U~r :ronclorocl nss-; stnnco of o.ny lcir:-cl tot or nic.lod c,nd o.bott0d1 in tJ-:o coa::rlssion of tl:o cI1nrJ0Ll orJ.r:10s0 Their conviction w::-,s t.'·icroforo nisconcoi vod, wi t!-.o·ut :ronsonably nci:.optublo .:nr:i.·l0r..oo, .::m.,l their nppo:::i:l.:3 . ' ;.~,.-,-:/; 1:.:) c':1.lowod,, ::mcl their . convic'tions .,,·~'-~· n-~c "C'"~·cr10"'S qu,.,h:.,,.i._,1 1 - u 1 '"'O't- ""'J..C 0 -~ ..:, ;.:·..'.J. - ,::> '.1..L_U t..l.·V 0 ~- :, - tl 01' r frooson ..a..;:s· to 1)0 _..,,..L,'StOI'.'OCl 0 ,,J. ""' untO' t:J.Cf.1e ,. 0 t11.o 7t~1 111)poil::.1?-t/ 6th o,ccusod person, nppc:1rct on tho
st_o.gc now.: I ho.vo ·cbovD c"l.o:mnstrntod_. l::.o~;r ?., T, 1 thought -tho 7th np:_:iollint wns 11,.11:::ttob.r:10.n/ ho s~-w .. · t;'.'.:i ;J :--.;>:.1 _:;_:.-r1,, nas T.HoBo wo.tchn:m, S\J.1)1_,0~:cc.l t.) 1)0 :at :.1is p;_'."CO o:f work, .£nr o.u.'.ly f:ron t:1c scone of crirJOi It w01:;-" '. 'X, in.,CJ'.'igc~:nc inc1.c~.d.g if n.t tl10 rn:itoriul tir.10, 1.:..0 wo..s nt t)10 s:oonc To avoid~ boe.:Jnr; tho q·::: Jtion~ :i.t is not uort:.1 uhilo ~ o,f:td . 01"' not L 110 was, ,I ,,_11a·,;0 1:ioon swept like othorso In cross-examination, the VDl"IJ :r._w,, 1 replied, --~-•-,-•--------,--·-···-·~ ~'You ar0 wctob.rnni __ ,rith.,___ tho T~rr~Bo. Y~ g o s t·od in · · t'.:3...El<?~E.E:~,. · · •.It ~ · E.£\.E.9.£~~~2st_.:?~-~~.:-3a.." Inclocd_, l'o Wo 1 novor a:rrcstocl .tt o .:._ppollant 9 encl ., Wl. i:;1'.1 . noboC.y liJ.10'\'JS U~lO m.Tcstod illLl,1 .::o.nd how l:c was joihod l· · ot::.e:i:s~ cmd wcy, is diffic·u.:tt to n11;:;~c ._J:~,~ It is clear i11, my hµn1bl0 opinio11, this ovid.01100 far ',c,u J• ..,.:J.J.ng t',.1n t t'..us · appo11::mt_~ wn.s· in tho fi1·st )1 nco at 1 ·• c- ··-s'·o•-.-1· o.c- cs--'--"' 1-- ...,, · fa·•··' - ~ -- .1.1.1 1. 1 ·\;Jio sr:.cno er cr:i.m'.. soc~mdl;r t!.12the!I oi tbcr diroctly particj]_)lltod 11 or rendo:rod. assist2nco 1 in ts, _:_·01:pc:t.,.,ati. or. . of c:.'imo~ Thcrcfoi~c tl-:.a:..~o was no ovidcnce to ;rn:,:YJ01"1i
comiict:;_on 9 and t:'.:.o a:;;,poal must be nllowcJ., 00111,,'icH,:.~- ,:uas:::.cd., and scntc"1ce;s sot ::.side◊ ThG 8 1st, 2nd, 3:td, 4th accused porsonr:: -· 1st, 8th, L!.th and 3:ttl 'i::rppolla- • nts rcspocti voly aro persons, that a.re so donor::inationalizo_d by -sJ-:.o ov:Ldoncc, i- ' that tl1oy n:i.~o obvious, they slc.ou.ld · ; dcl t with, tocot;:ier hc:roundero Accord.in{; to t'..:o evidence of ?a Uo 1 ..~o sc.w tho 1st and 2nd accused - 1st nnd 8th appellants carrying tho bn.gs of rice from 1T ?MoC• unto tho lorry, whoi•o tho said rice, was boins loaded by tho 3rd and 4"ih accUF,ods/ 4th and 3rd n:;_)poll::i,nts. It was nt t:10 dead of nigl:.t, about J,3) a"m"' 9 r,w.1 sur-.Qrisod t~'.'.c:-.1, - ouch against t~:oir expectations ,_ t!:cy wore so -to speak caught rod-)'.andod, intorrocc.torJ. them, and finally o.rrostcd tLom, nnd took thorn to tI:-:.o I'olico Station with t:.:eir loot.. In tho circiu::sta.ncos~ in so far as these a1)pollants arc concornocl 9 floating llu.Idlos, like difficulty of identification, nig).1t conditions, otc, would. hit and 1Ju.m:p into, and off tho imr;rutablo wnll of 9vilcnco, as oonsicloring how close to tho sc·:mo and a:p:pollnnts, T.~·fo1 was, ·his. survi"'iso to· thco and di:roct intorvontion1 loadinG to intcr:rocr:rtions, which roportoclly yielded tho conti"'itc and. penitent roq__uost, 11 tvJ.indo nzoo" frofil, t,;.10 ·,o,
c:,lJi,.i.12:nt, tl:oi:r nrrost 3nd oscoi."t to the ?olico Station, nista:ccn identification can safely be ruled out, and humbly o,.,,_t oonficl.ontly it is. Tlw.t those appellants in conco•:t and joint ontorprisc 1 did take thirty fi vc bags of rico and lot:-::1.- thom into Sca:nia TZ., 77552 lo:i::i.--y, which was oL:t o.:.' ·';'._:..:1 l:,i;J\, :,-1•:.'-1.:, 2.t t~10 doad and with cover of night, without the cor..sent enc:.. knowledge of the N .MC. os. tnblishnont, is as :,loo.r, ::ts dnyligh1,, Conin(; to tho charcros 1 the n.pr - lorts together nre on first count . ;C'o.cin;:; t.':_.J cL:::.rgo of conspirc.-cy to vv.:i..1it 1 an office (felony) c/s 384 of tho J?e:m:,l Cocl.o Capo 16 of tl10 Ltrwso I oust concodo and confess~ that tho proof of conspiracy is nn area., that is either slipporly, and :.:? an 8.n i::ir>ea 1t_he proscct:Uon forgets arcia tho i,rosooution shudder to be in, or L'iJ:::;:;'l in t,.1.e p1'ocoss of :0:::co0f'o And wl:d.lc no int0foa1"0ncc wi tl.+ t'.10 p:eosocution is intcnclod, I hnvo a fooling tkit, uhoro the cour.1ission of an offonco, is u1 tinatoly consur.:iatccl, it is u.imocossa:ry to olso cl:Dr.SO, conspiracy to conni t tL::i so.id offonco, conspi:i:ccy bo:;.i:1g aft or all inchoate and prolir;.1ino.ry, to tl'::.o cor:1910 jo offonco, ·t..u:llcss t~lcro aro co-0ri:::tir,,; c::.:rcumstanccs J.ic,~atints such course of 2ctio11c In t'.,is case,
thoro · is no rxmtion of conspiracy in t~o whole length o~ ovidonoc~ and un:forlvn,1-l;oly} not oven the trial raagistratc did rofo:r to t:::o snr:ic, nor iclontify tllo o-:'idonco pertaining to t~10 sape 1 . . althoug;.1 at t'.10 ond of tl10 d.ny, ho convictocl tho appoll2nts on tl1b said count~ -~11 t:10 ~:,.;io on oy pc:-i."t1 I shall not ;:(.:.yD.wr:.:y, it fells to be snic'J that for tl'.o purposes of proof of ::;o:,.1,,;1n l-.1cy the ovicl.onco. nUJ?,t show, ( 1) an .s.e,~001:1cnt for an o.llo(;cd. ,,_;.::~ ..1; :,..c L _p-:x, )08(.:C, ... 2 .:... t\.;:; n.0cusod 1 s partici:Qction in it. Thus, it is opon to tho prosecution, to Gi-;":; ovidc;1co of tho acts of tho incli vidu:.l accused persons, w_i th a view to provinc; tL0 ,5cnoral oonspiri:lcy, . _;~~ sluw t::at tL.c nets of each accusocl .• ' :pprson, .-were clone in pursuance of n cor:mon design• As wa? poin.tod o~t, in ·'• C' ·.. . , . , ... .~ . n , 11 • ·aore:~tJ.IB K.'.lWI K:\.TIL\. xm ..;.i'WTHER, ( 1949L 16 R~c~~ 116. 11.\.s ( counsel) p:.rtinontly obso::>·vcd 1 conspirators do not noraoily ncot to::;ut~1er ::md cxocuto, o.,: ..,od sottints ent clotoils of their con::ion unlawful~ purpose. It is com.1on pl::::o,j to· saJ' t;1cit· an n.3-rco:1cnt to conspire ;_,ny bo deducted fro□ any nets, w:1ich rnisv t::o prosw:1ption of. n coor.10n desicri•" Indeed, it ncvor is cocr:on, fox ·conspirators to cxocuto clcods of
their oriqinol agl'oe;-1cnt, nor iq it often, .if o.t all, that suoll conspirotors have self inplicc:tineslY volunteered t~w details of their. conspirci,cy disseninatinsly, - it woulcl bo suicidol. Corr.1on senco, woulci' in the ci};'ou:-.1stoncos advise, that such crininal conspiracy, nay bo inforrod ·:eraci the_ conclucts of tho accusecls, . ,. . ~ . . ... , .. ... .,,. ... ··- . ~ ~ which qoncluct would, r.?.iso ~>c j;)resUDp_tio~ of n. coJ.1r,on. dosi,:;n... C~rtj,s_s to ..., ....-... - . " " . .:•. . _,,. ....~.... ,-· ,., --· "" .. . ' ... :/ '.. ~- , '"'" " - .. ,. ' ' . ,this onso, . that tho four _D,J?P.ollonts" shouJ..d .no.oid.en~al_l7,. but_ ~o-inci~!;.ontally, . . ' t' :. : ... .., .--,~·t --········ be loadh~es t::.c Scli:1C TZ 77552; ct'·t!:c" snno' tfr.10, sc:.1e, c1::J,y,, sano place, scr.10 rioo, . fL"Ow sc::o place, ocin only hUppQn-in' dron~1 land, f:ir boyond tho laws of . - . .. .. no.turc, c..n(1.. logic. It is s:i.fe to oonoludo. in tho oi~cunstunocs, tl".o.t tho . appollonts c1icl ~osiisn, a.grco, 1:m.c.l docidod. t.ogot_hor to _participate ·in,. :::n::l did pnrtici?ate, at an hour,· plnco, day, pronoclitntcC.ly Cl-Grcod upono . Tl:.at . on iihis ovi:lonce, they dicl conspire to cor.c1:1i t offonco c:~nrg0d tl:orof'oro, is c:cy·stc:!1' cloor, and tl:o conviction on tlJ.o first co1,1.11t, was vory dosoi--vod, and _in0Vi ta1)lo. Cocine to counts ( 2) il.1
respect of tho 1st and 8th nppollnnts,. and cou:nt No. (3) in :c•os:poot of 3ri ni1c1. 4th nppollnnts, it is cloa.r and beyond doul)t, and pa1'-ndvo;,1tuxo, as already above dononstratod th~t, in t~1oir rospoctivu oraploy;:icnt ca1.x1oi tios, tho nppollants did steal tho :DI.Mo C• rice - ;ii'.:: j;,;t.:·~:,r fi vo b2c,'S, t!:ough tho foroor wore· servants; and ·not poi"Sons e,.1ployecl in pu1Jlic sorvi.ce. Their conVictions were as dosorvod; as t:tcy woi,a obviously a i.w.st. I' would l:.owover in rospoct of t1:.c fomer appellonts, set nsido the convictions under soc;tion 270 of tho renal Coclo, but con.Vi~t than unclor sc·ction 271 of \; 4 tho I'onnl- Cock Cop. 16• Their [1:ppoals . against conviotfons nro cl~s[1issod, ,, dcisorwc'.lly 2,ni t!1c convictions- u-pholtl~ --- t - Tho appoll:mt 1st, 3~; _4th .?::~· _8~!1 ,app~ilnnts · sontenco of nine yc::irs inprisonr.1ont, wa,s oxcossi vo, in tho ·ci:rounst2ncos. Incloocl .!:!s oorlior s.::iid., on· counts No. (4) ::i.nd (3), t].:.c nppollants, wore sontcncod to riino j7CO.m i□].):ri.son::1ent. .\.cco:ixhng to tho tri.'.11 Mo.c,istrnto' s proanble to tho scntc,nco, such sontonce, wns ir.1posod to protect tl-.o Co!'l_:)orn.tion, which .1.,,..,ch · No:t-1.Co is, ~rd to L~,.,.,_ . t;1c nJ.:r;;ioll-'.:mts, thnt 11 Cri;:ic do-ys ;,1ot pny"• I cnrnostly• wish ti:o ti"io,l Mngistrnto well~ in ::.in cru;:;:,c.o, to to:::c~h cmd
ow.ngolisc, thc,t crino cloos not pay, if t~:cre is such thing, if t'.::c so;yi.:.1g, t:·.nt every rich.1-:i::i.n 10 - h::.s o: cri::.10 lJol~ind l:..ir.1 7 is onpty, non.nin0loss :ind wi t:.:.out llatont .._.jsdom. But I wovlc1- ndviso, t: .nt in tho crusado dri vo, )-:.c s!10ulJ so do, within tho confinos of t::c law, l:c is ndr :: istorinG, nncl not c::i.-rclossly fly off --t::mc;cnt, t:-.c l::1wo In tl:is cnso, ... ndcoi No~:IoCo, is n 11 sp0cificd nut~1ori t;i', un1or tho Minir.1un Sontoncos _'i.ct 1972, cmcl for t~'.O pu.r-;,osos of application of the s::11:10, 1-t:icb. tho trial Mag.istr.::to di::1. not, t}io ' Mini□urJ Sontcncos _\.ct 1972, is applicnblo, ::m:::L t'..:.o aIJroll::mts nro 1i.:1blo to be :Dt'mis~·-od t;:oroundor, in so far as counts (2) nr:d. (3) ::i.ro concomoc1. Since tb.o nnount involved is Shs. 297,506/=, t>. o tricl Hn[P..strnto, coulclj dri von by l:.is c.rw3:i.do s:piri t 1 ri9-1tly swing to t::\o nnrlnm iDprisonmcnt sentence, loc;nlly nllowod - Soo Section '170 of tl:o Crir:iin-.:21 Irococluro Act ~ 19840 Th'--~t w:.1oro n Court Convicts a parson for n sc'.:.cdulod Offonco 2 it . an.:z: if sy. cl::. sontcnco is autliorizod by law 2 pass a sonton..co of ir.1prisonr:1on! for such c t<?l-"'1!1 not c.:x:coodinr; oi,#1t yonrso 11 It follows tl:cit, in imposing a sontcncc of nine years i1:1prisoru1ont, on 2nd snd 3rcl 00"1.:mts, · ho was
gate crasl::.inc,; - }:io :.::.~d no lioonoo so foi~-<t~ct~ 8no inv:L tation earl to go boyoncl t~10 area. c1.on::,,,:rca.tod by tho law -fio, such sontonco wns illo,;c.lo In t:'.::.o- circunstnncr:;s, s-uch illegal sontoncd is• sot aside, anc1 inposcd instond 1 is n scntonco of oight yc::irs inpr.isonracnt, on o.::i,c;::. counts ~ 2) c,nd p_), :o ru"1 conctD~:rontly with tho sont.:;;1~c on cou::1t :, o, 1 o Tllo apj_Joals by tt.o. _1st, 8th, 4tl:. c:.ncl 3ro. nppoll©.nts · nro c1ismissod, lmt for t'.~.o c:.~:i.13'0 in sonton~c, The nppoo..ls l)y ti:c. 2nc1, 5t:1, 6tl:, 7tl~ the a:ppollnnts :l!TI.IJ:G.:\.- s/q Ivi..iCill:YA, . .3ILI.DR.:WK MAT-lLU; .DOT'l'O 1,UG-'>NG..'l._, E.~-~_J)ICTOR JORN' arc n-llowod 1 ·convictions qun- s::.ocl1 ::.~~o.:-:. sontoncos sot as~clo,, Such np:pcllol'its to bo roloasod forthwith, unless -t:::.oy Clio ot'..'.orwiso legally l10ldo Dolivcrocl this 16th dny' .i.pr:il, 19920 Eo TT. K..l.TITI, JUDGE:
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.