19990304 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The decisions of both the Conciliation Board and the Minister were vitiated by bias and failure to deliberate on all relevant issues, specifically the question of insubordination, rendering their decisions invalid.
- Citation
- 19990304 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: CRDB (1996) Limited; Respondent: The Minister for Labour & Youth Development
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; decisions of the Conciliation Board and Minister quashed and set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Certiorari, Mandamus, Natural Justice, Bias in Tribunals, Employment Dismissal, Internal Disciplinary Procedures
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CRDB (1996) Limited
Applicant
The Minister for Labour & Youth Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision of the Minister and Conciliation Board was tainted by bias
- 2 Whether the Board and Minister failed to deliberate on all relevant issues, specifically insubordination
- 3 Whether the transfer of Martin Rutahakana was properly effected under internal regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The decisions of both the Conciliation Board and the Minister were vitiated by bias and failure to deliberate on all relevant issues, specifically the question of insubordination, rendering their decisions invalid.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; decisions of the Conciliation Board and Minister quashed and set aside.
Orders
- Decisions of the Conciliation Board and Minister/Respondent are quashed and set aside.
- Hearing to be conducted de novo before a properly constituted Board.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment