20060302 TZHC Bukoba
The applicant failed to prove total indigence but demonstrated limited means. The court found he could afford to pay a reduced amount or provide alternative security without suffering considerable hardship. Therefore, total exemption was denied, but a reduced security for costs or alternative security was ordered.
- Citation
- 20060302 TZHC Bukoba
- Parties
- Petitioner: Wilfred s/o Muganyizi Rwakatare; 1st Respondent: Hamis s/o Sued Kagasheki; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Misc. Civil Cause (election Petition) / Ruling on Application for Exemption From Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for total exemption from security for costs denied; partial relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Access to Justice, Election Petitions, Court Discretion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilfred s/o Muganyizi Rwakatare
Petitioner
Hamis s/o Sued Kagasheki
1st Respondent
The Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Cause (election Petition) / Ruling on Application for Exemption From Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be exempted from payment of security for costs under section 111(5) of the National Elections Act
- 2 Whether the applicant qualifies for total exemption or alternative form of security based on financial hardship
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to prove total indigence but demonstrated limited means. The court found he could afford to pay a reduced amount or provide alternative security without suffering considerable hardship. Therefore, total exemption was denied, but a reduced security for costs or alternative security was ordered.
Court Disposition
Application for total exemption from security for costs denied; partial relief granted.
Orders
- Applicant to pay five hundred thousand shillings (500,000/=) as security for costs in respect of each respondent within fourteen (14) days from the date of ruling, or alternatively deposit a title deed for immovable property valued at not less than one million shillings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment