20120607 TZHC Dar es Salaam

20120607 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The High Court lacks jurisdiction because the amount claimed falls within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Resident Magistrate and District Court, and the law mandates suits be filed in the court of the lowest grade competent to try them.

Citation
20120607 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Parties
Plaintiff: A. B. Imani Pharmacy; Defendant: Medical Express Tanzania Limited
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
Suit struck out for want of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Institution of Suit
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A. B. Imani Pharmacy

Plaintiff

Medical Express Tanzania Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear a suit where the claim falls within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Resident Magistrate or District Court

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction because the amount claimed falls within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Resident Magistrate and District Court, and the law mandates suits be filed in the court of the lowest grade competent to try them.

Court Disposition

Suit struck out for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Suit is struck out