20120619 TZHC Arusha
The suit is time barred as the plaintiff failed to file his claim against the 2nd defendant within six years from the accrual of the right to sue, as required by the Law of Limitation Act.
- Citation
- 20120619 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Anaeli Eniy'o'y'e; 1st Defendant: The Honourable Attorney General; 2nd Defendant: Labour Commissioner
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed for being time barred
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Trade Disputes, Jurisdiction, Dismissal for Time Barred Claims
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Anaeli Eniy'o'y'e
Plaintiff
The Honourable Attorney General
1st Defendant
Labour Commissioner
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is time barred under the Law of Limitation Act
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's claim against the Labour Commissioner was filed within the prescribed limitation period
Ratio Decidendi
The suit is time barred as the plaintiff failed to file his claim against the 2nd defendant within six years from the accrual of the right to sue, as required by the Law of Limitation Act.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed for being time barred
Orders
- Suit dismissed for being time barred
- Each party to bear their own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment