20130730 TZCA Iringa

20130730 TZCA Iringa

The applicant failed to disclose any grounds for review as required under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, and merely sought a reassessment of evidence already considered on appeal, which is not a valid basis for review.

Citation
20130730 TZCA Iringa
Parties
Applicant: Eusebio Nyenzi; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Review of Appellate Judgment, Finality of Litigation, Requirements for Review Under Rule 66
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Review of Appellate Judgment Finality of Litigation Requirements for Review Under Rule 66

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eusebio Nyenzi

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for review met the requirements under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
  2. 2 Whether the applicant raised any valid ground for review

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to disclose any grounds for review as required under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, and merely sought a reassessment of evidence already considered on appeal, which is not a valid basis for review.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for review is dismissed