Alex Ruling2

Alex Ruling2

The cautioned statement was recorded well beyond the four-hour period after the accused was placed under police restraint, with no reasons provided for the delay as required by law. This non-compliance with sections 50 and 51 of the Criminal Procedure Act renders the statement incompetent and inadmissible.

Citation
Alex Ruling2
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Alex Faustine
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sessions Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Cautioned Statement
Outcome
Objection upheld; cautioned statement rejected as inadmissible evidence.
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Cautioned Statement, Time Limits for Recording Statements, Compliance With Criminal Procedure Act
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

Alex Faustine

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sessions Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Cautioned Statement

  1. 1 Whether the cautioned statement was recorded within the time limit prescribed by law
  2. 2 Whether the cautioned statement is invalid due to discrepancies in time and identity
  3. 3 Whether non-compliance with sections 50 and 51 of the Criminal Procedure Act renders the statement inadmissible

Ratio Decidendi

The cautioned statement was recorded well beyond the four-hour period after the accused was placed under police restraint, with no reasons provided for the delay as required by law. This non-compliance with sections 50 and 51 of the Criminal Procedure Act renders the statement incompetent and inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Objection upheld; cautioned statement rejected as inadmissible evidence.

Orders

  • Prayer for admission of cautioned statement is rejected.