the republic vs peter ntingwa peter 2023 tzhc 23278 5 december 2023
The defence cannot effectively cross-examine or demonstrate contradictions without possession of the original previous statement of PW1; therefore, the Republic must supply the original statement to the defence to comply with procedural fairness and the requirements of section 154 of the Evidence Act as interpreted by precedent.
- Citation
- the republic vs peter ntingwa peter 2023 tzhc 23278 5 december 2023
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Peter Ntingwa Peter
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sessions Case / Interlocutory Ruling on Defence Application During Cross Examination
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Cross Examination, Contradiction of Witness Statements, Production of Documents
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Peter Ntingwa Peter
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sessions Case / Interlocutory Ruling on Defence Application During Cross Examination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defence is entitled to the original hand-written witness statement of PW1 for purposes of cross-examination under section 154 of the Evidence Act
Ratio Decidendi
The defence cannot effectively cross-examine or demonstrate contradictions without possession of the original previous statement of PW1; therefore, the Republic must supply the original statement to the defence to comply with procedural fairness and the requirements of section 154 of the Evidence Act as interpreted by precedent.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The Republic is ordered to supply the original previous statement of PW1 to the defence for purposes of cross-examination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment